Laserfiche WebLink
<br />41{ <br /> <br />'----- <br /> <br />997 <br />-50 <br />40 <br />35 <br />30 <br />25 <br />20 <br />-10 <br /> <br />SEPTEMBER 1988 <br /> <br />MARK F. HEGGLI AND ROBERT M, RAUBER <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />300 <br /> <br />'4. "--- 1lff. <br />--=40 <br />~ <br />u... <br />~ <br />\" <br /> <br />1JL <br /> <br />.f4. <br /> <br />4U.. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />4JJ. <br /> <br />lliJ. <br /> <br />llL. <br /> <br />400 <br /> <br />_500 <br />1 E <br />w :::5 <br />or I- <br />~600 ;; <br />;;;4 <br />or " <br />"- <br /> 700 <br /> 800- <br /> 900 <br /> 1000 <br /> <br />300 <br /> <br /> 400 <br />:;;500 E <br />.5 :::5 <br />w <br />or ~ <br />~600 C> <br />~ ;;;4 <br /> " <br /> 700 <br /> 800 <br /> 900 <br /> 1000 <br /> 09 <br /> <br />I <br />00 <br />(3/28) <br /> <br />I <br />21 <br /> <br />TIME <br /> <br />1 -1 -5 <br /> <br />.-0 <br />j ~ 5 <br /> <br />, <br />..' <br /> <br /> <br />318 <br /> <br />00 <br />(3/27) <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />09 <br />(3126) <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />FIa. 5, 0900 UTC 26 March 1985 to 0900 UTC 28 March 1985: (Top) Time/height cross section of equivalent potential temperature (Oe) (K); <br />shading denotes regions where Oe/Z < O. (Bottom) Time/height cross section of temperature, relative humidity with respect to water, and winds, The <br />shading corresponds to regions where relative humidity is between 60-79% (lightest), 80%-89% (middle) and 90%-100% (darkest). A short wind barb <br />is 5 m S-I, long barb is 10 m S-I and a flag is 50 m S-I. An arrow indicates winds less than 2.5 m S-I. Frontal positions are indicated in the figure. <br /> <br />characteristics of an anafront, consistent with models <br />of frontal structure presented by Hobbs (1978), <br />Browning and Monk (1982), and Browning (1985). The <br />passage of the front corresponded approximately in <br />time with the passage of the upper-level jet core. Strong <br />upper-level subsidence occurred west of the jet with <br />clearing over the valley behind the front and cloud <br />tops lowering over the mountain. An orographic cloud <br />containing embedded convective cells remained over <br />the Sierra Nevada. Convection within the cloud system <br />developed in response to the lifting of a layer of po- <br />tential instability that developed behind the front <br />(Fig. 5). <br />The passage of the front at Kingvale was accompa- <br />nied by upper-level subsidence, a decrease in cloud <br />depth, a reduction in precipitation rate from 4 to 1 <br /> <br />mm h-1 and an increase in supercooled water from <br />0.10 to 0.50 mm. During the next 9 h, radiometer <br />measurements of liquid were generally near 0.30 mm <br />with spikes to 1.30 mm. This type of signature was <br />often associated with an orographic cloud system con- <br />taining embedded convection (Heggli and Reynolds <br />1984). <br />A second region of moisture moved into central <br />California at approximately 1200 UTC 27 March. This <br />moisture was contained entirely within the cold air <br />mass. The leading edge of this moist air moved over <br />the Sierra Nevada crest at 1345. With its arrival, pre- <br />cipitation rates increased and supercooled water values <br />reduced to 0.05-0.10 mm, similar to what was observed <br />in the warm frontal cloud. This observation is consis- <br />tent ~vith observation of frontal clouds that have a <br />