Laserfiche WebLink
<br />998 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 27 <br /> <br />x 1.5 <br />.... <br />0. <br />w <br />0 <br />0:_1.0 <br />wE <br />....E <br />4(- <br />3= <br />e 0.5 <br />:;:) <br />a <br />:J 0,0 <br /> 8 <br />z 6 <br />0- <br />t:I~ <br />~E 4 <br />2;A <br />0 <br />w 2 <br />0: <br />0. <br /> 0 <br /> 09 <br /> <br />~L~~~~ <br /> <br /> <br />03 <br /> <br />00 <br />(3/27) <br /> <br />06 <br /> <br />:I: 1,5 <br />.... <br />0. <br />w <br />o <br />0:_1.0 <br />wE <br />~A <br />~ 0.5 <br />5 <br />a <br />:J 0.0 <br />8 <br /> <br />~\~-- <br /> <br />z 6 <br />0_ <br />P; <br />~~ 4 <br />~~ <br />o- <br />Il! 2 <br />0. <br /> <br />ACCUMULATION <br />2..1 <br />r"l <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br /> <br />09 <br />(3/26) <br /> <br />--~ <br /> <br /> <br />!JJ~1 <br />N 'IfJ y~ <br /> <br />J........... _" .._ <br /> <br /> <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />09 <br /> <br />06 <br /> <br />03 <br /> <br />00. 21 18 <br />(3/28) <br />TIME (UTe) <br /> <br />09 <br />(3/27) <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />fiG. 6. Supercooled liquid water depth (mm) measured vertically by the radiometer between 0900 UTC 26 <br />March 1985 and 0900 UTC 28 March 1985 at Kingvale. The precipitation rate at Kingvale is also shown. <br /> <br />seeder-feeder precipitation mechanism (Matejka et al. <br />1980). A deeper moist layer continued to affect the <br />region through 0900 28 March, when measurements <br />were terminated. <br />Discussion. The 26-29 March 1985 storm was one <br />of 14 storm systems that developed in strong westerly <br />or southwesterly flow during the four field seasons. <br />These storm systems consistently produced sustained <br />high precipitation rates and the largest precipitation <br />amounts in the Sierra Nevada. The storms all had long <br />(~45 h or greater) durations. The synoptic-scale evo- <br />lutions were generally similar to that described for the <br />26-29 March case. A warm front was typically observed <br />at the leading region of the storms. Strong cold fronts <br />were present. In certain storms, the jet stream axis was <br />near the position of the surface front. In other cases, <br /> <br />the jet stream axis led the surface cold front and the <br />subsidence region evident in Fig. 5 was displaced over, <br />rather than behind, the cold frontal position. An oro- <br />graphic cloud, usually with embedded convection, re- <br />mained after frontal passage. In some cases, such as <br />26-29 March, secondary moisture regions advected <br />into the area, enhancing precipitation rates. These re- <br />gions were associated with weak, secondary waves de- <br />veloping within the storm. Weak convective instability <br />generally was present throughout the postfrontal pe- <br />riod. <br />Because of the orientation of flow fields in these <br />storms, the majority were characterized by high freezing <br />levels in central California. As a result, rain often fell <br />at the radiometer site, and radiometric data in these <br />cases were contaminated by the rainfall. Of the 14 <br /> <br />