Laserfiche WebLink
<br />990 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 27 <br /> <br /> <br />Santa Clara County <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />miles <br />o 50 <br />I. ..' <br />b' ~ . eO <br />kilometers <br /> <br />190 <br />. <br />160 <br /> <br />Lake Almanor Drainage Bosin <br /> <br />Portions of the Americon River Basin <br /> <br />:rruckee- Tahoe Basin <br />Upper American River <br />Upper Mokelumne River Watenhed <br />Carson-Walker Drainage <br /> <br />Upper San Joaquin <br />River Watershed <br /> <br />Upper Kings River <br />Watershed <br /> <br />() <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />FIG. I. River basins where operational weather modification programs have been <br />conducted in California during 1975/85 (source: California Dept. of Water Resources). <br /> <br />These new observational tools provided the tech- <br />nology for renewed exploration of supercooled water <br />within storms. Measurements of supercooled water us- <br />ing these instruments led to the realization that aircraft <br />measurements provided an incomplete description of <br />the supercooled water structure and distribution in <br />Sierra Nevada storms. Supercooled water was found <br />in many parts of storms where it had not been previ- <br />ously identified. In particular, significant amounts of <br />supercooled water often appeared at altitudes that were <br />below the minimum clearance for safe flight (Heggli <br />1986). Another study by Heggli and Reynolds (1985) <br />found that storms having split-front characteristics de- <br />veloped supercooled water following the passage of the <br />upper-level front. In a series of cases studied by Heggli <br />(1985), supercooled water was shown to increase near <br />the time of cirrus passage. Studies like this, however, <br />are limited by the case-study approach, which empha- <br />sizes the features of a few or sometimes a single storm. <br />A broader study, evaluating all storms, was warranted. <br />In this paper, we provide a comprehensive analysis <br />of the evolution and distribution of supercooled water <br />in Sierra Nevada storm systems that occurred during <br />the period the radiometer was available to SCPP. In <br />performing this analysis, storm types were identified <br />that accounted for the majority of storms occurring in <br /> <br />the project area from 1983/84 through 1986/87. The <br />storm typing was based on synoptic characteristics, <br />such as storm trajectory and cloud features. <br />The objective of this study is to describe how su- <br />percooled water evolves near the Sierra Nevada crest- <br />line during each of the storm types. The relationship <br />between liquid water presence in clouds and large-scale <br />storm features is considered. Altitudes and tempera- <br />tures of liquid-bearing cloud layers are also estimated <br />using data from the radiometer and collocated rawin- <br />sondes. The results clarify previous findings reported <br />by the SCPP and provide a basis for improving regional <br />weather modification programs. <br /> <br />2. Research site and instrumentation <br /> <br />The SCPP program operated in the American River <br />Basin of the central Sierra Nevada Mountains in Cal- <br />ifornia. A map of the research site showing the topog- <br />raphy, the location of the study area in the state of <br />California, and the location of instrumentation used <br />in this paper, is given in Fig. 2. Because the complete <br />network of instrumentation used during SCPP and a <br />thorough discussion of the SCPP program are provided <br />by Reynolds and Dennis (1986), only instrumentation <br />important to this paper will be described. <br />