Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of ice was other than an incidental characteristic due to the lower <br /> <br />temperature or that it substantially altered the course of the coales- <br /> <br />cence produced shower. <br /> <br />In seeded clouds, ice was encountered first in the central updraft <br />regions, where ice particles were observed to grow to precipitation size <br />as they reached the upper part of the cloud during its actively growing <br />phase. The initial growth phase was followed not by immediate decay as <br />was the case with unseeded clouds, but by a dynamic rejuvenation that <br />was accompanied by the reappearance of supercooled liquid water and con- <br />tinued hydrometeor growth. In 7 out of IS cases the cloud rejuvenation <br />was accompanied by such severe icing conditions in the cloud that air- <br />plane penetrations had to be broken off. This reinforcement of cloud <br />growth by the dynamic effect and rejuvenation of active condensation <br />(processing of additional water vapor) and precipitation led to pro- <br />longation of the precipitating phase and to augmentation of the precip- <br />itation amount. <br /> <br />In short, though there does exist a rational basis for comparing the <br /> <br />effectiveness of radar and dense rain gage networks as estimators of <br /> <br />total rainfall at the ground, Osborn fails to give evidence for the <br /> <br />superiority of the latter, especially in the rugged terrain of Arizona <br /> <br />and especially where the microphysics, dynamics, and rainfall of indi- <br /> <br />vidual clouds are concerned. <br /> <br />11 <br />