My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00306 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00306 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:35:03 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 4:23:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Discusison of "Weather Modification in Arizona in 1971" by Herbert A. Osborn
Date
6/1/1972
State
AZ
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />of ice was other than an incidental characteristic due to the lower <br /> <br />temperature or that it substantially altered the course of the coales- <br /> <br />cence produced shower. <br /> <br />In seeded clouds, ice was encountered first in the central updraft <br />regions, where ice particles were observed to grow to precipitation size <br />as they reached the upper part of the cloud during its actively growing <br />phase. The initial growth phase was followed not by immediate decay as <br />was the case with unseeded clouds, but by a dynamic rejuvenation that <br />was accompanied by the reappearance of supercooled liquid water and con- <br />tinued hydrometeor growth. In 7 out of IS cases the cloud rejuvenation <br />was accompanied by such severe icing conditions in the cloud that air- <br />plane penetrations had to be broken off. This reinforcement of cloud <br />growth by the dynamic effect and rejuvenation of active condensation <br />(processing of additional water vapor) and precipitation led to pro- <br />longation of the precipitating phase and to augmentation of the precip- <br />itation amount. <br /> <br />In short, though there does exist a rational basis for comparing the <br /> <br />effectiveness of radar and dense rain gage networks as estimators of <br /> <br />total rainfall at the ground, Osborn fails to give evidence for the <br /> <br />superiority of the latter, especially in the rugged terrain of Arizona <br /> <br />and especially where the microphysics, dynamics, and rainfall of indi- <br /> <br />vidual clouds are concerned. <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.