My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00306 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00306 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:35:03 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 4:23:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Discusison of "Weather Modification in Arizona in 1971" by Herbert A. Osborn
Date
6/1/1972
State
AZ
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />has been chosen for the most advanced weather modification experiments. <br />indicating its widespread acceptance. <br /> <br />An additional important advantage of radar measurements over a dense <br />rain gage is the yield of information about precipitation parameters <br />such as height of echo top that cannot be obtained from rain gages. and <br />the chance to incorporate these data into experimental designs and <br />evaluations directly related to the cloud microphysics and dynamics. <br />The contributions of insights gained in this way to the development of <br />the Flagstaff treatment technology (Smith and Weinstein. 1971) should <br />not be overlooked. Among the findings that are pertinent to the ques- <br />tions raised by Osborn concerning precipitation decrease are the <br />following: <br /> <br />In unseeded clouds, ice was in all cases first encountered in decaying, <br />downdraft, or well-dissipated regions of the cloud. spreading into the <br />rest of the cloud as this also began to decay. This glaciation phase <br />tended to follow closely upon the phase in which the cloud. if it pro- <br />duced precipitation at all, had converted most of the available condensed <br />liquid to precipitation through a coalescence process. In the decaying <br />phase, a change from relatively few rapidly growing ice particles to a <br />large number of small crystals was taken to indicate the operation of <br />some crystal-multiplication mechanism. Since the showers themselves <br />went through the same phases of growth and decay already well documented <br />for all-water shower clouds, no indication was found that the appearance <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.