Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />cloud at the proper ~empera~ure allowed seec1ng effects to <br />occur nearer the seeding location. In this case, seeding <br />increments of about 0.2 mm/hr occurred to the east of the <br />Grouse Creek Mountains, while the maximum effect occurred <br />in the Raf~ River ~ountains. In spite of the upwind displacement <br />of seeding effec~s rela~ive to ground-based seeding, blowover <br />of effects into Idaho also occurred. <br /> <br />It should be remembered in viewing these and subsequent <br />modeling runs that results apply only for the meteorological <br />condi~ions used in the model. Different winds or temperatures <br />oould result in different values and locations of the increment. <br />However, ~he rawinsonde da~a used for input were considered <br />representative. <br /> <br />In terms of logistics, the sparse population of the region <br />argues against ground-based seeding. Aerial seeding can be. <br />done on several of the Victor Airways upwind of the seeding <br />area, and minimuw. alti~ude requirements are not restrictive. <br /> <br />Based on these considerations, an aerial standby seeding <br />program is recommended. The base of operations could be Salt <br />Lake City, which has excellent instrument landing facilities. <br />Plight time from Salt Lake City to the seeding area should <br />be 45 ~inutes to an hour. Personnel should include a meteorologist <br />and a f~ll-time pilot. Some cost savings could be realized <br />by using an on-call pilot. However, considering the one hour <br />flig~t ~o the seeding area and the one to two hour lag required <br />for pilot notification and preparation, seeding opportunities <br /> <br />could be missed. <br /> <br />Since no weather observations are made near <br /> <br />t~e program area, a part-ti~e weather observer living in the <br />area, say Park Valley, should be used. <br /> <br />5-18 <br />