Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ORA F T <br /> <br />the most important and desirable result is to increase precipitation <br />and subsequent runoff, evaluation efforts will concentrate on those <br />areas which measure and document the changes in precipitation, <br />specifically the statistical and physical analyses. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The statistical evaluation, which is designed to document the results <br />of the experiment, must address a number of issues; experimental <br />design, avoidance of bias, statistical techniques, and others. In <br />previous experiments involving fixed target areas, the design has <br />employed single area, target-control, and crossover techniques. The <br />choice of design depends upon the area involved, the type of clouds <br />encountered within the area, and the experimental unit selected. To <br />avoid or minimize bias it is essential that randomization be used. A <br />number' of methods have been employed, all involving measurements of <br />an experimental unit (cloud, storm, day, 12-hour period, etc.), and a <br />comparison of the treated and untreated units. To minimize the time <br />required to achieve statistical significance the number of treated <br />and untreated units should be about the same, i.e., 50/50 randomization. <br /> <br />Since the response of the experimental unit to treatment can manifest <br />itself in a number of simultaneously occurring ways (changes in cloud <br />area, updraft speed, water and ice concentrations, and numerous <br />others) the statistical techniques employed must be capable of <br />incorporating these responses into a single test of significance. It <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />46 <br />