My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00299 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00299 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:34:37 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 4:23:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Scientific Weather Modification Experimentation in the United States
Date
8/25/1984
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~:.! <br /> <br />firmatory experiment (FACE-2) were conducted to test whether seeding in this <br />manner increased rai nfall on the ground. Although a conceptual modE~l and chai n <br />of physical events following seeding were specified (Woodley et al., 1982b), no <br />attempt was made to verify it through di rect observation and measurl~ment of the <br />i ntermedi ate processes. Both F ACE-1 and F ACE-2 were prima rily lib 1 ack-box" <br />experiments, with the evaluation of the results based on the statistical dif- <br />ferences in rainfall characteristics of the seed and non-seed populations. <br /> <br />Candidate experimental days were selected by evaluating a daily suitability <br />index that was based on maximum model-predicted seedability and morning shower <br />activity as observed by radar. Individual cloud suitability was based on visual <br />appearance and aircraft observations of cloud top height, updraft velocity and <br />liquid water. When the suitability criteria were met, pyrotechnic flares that <br />produced either 70 g of AgI or sand were ejected from an aircraft in the top of <br />the clouds on randomly selected seed and non-seed days, respectively. Typically <br />5 to 10 flares per seeding pass were released in the actively growing portion of <br />the treated clouds. Ground-level rainfall was estimated using S-band radar <br />observations after adjustment by rain gages. <br /> <br />The results of FACE-1 (Woodley et al., 1982b) provided evidence of precipitation <br />increases due to seeding. Analyses without predictors suggested apparent <br />increases in both location (mean and median) and the dispersion (standard <br />deviation and interquartile range) characteristics of rainfall due to seeding in <br />the total target (TT) and floating target (FT), the most intensely treated por- <br />tion of the target. Approximately 50% and 25% increases in the means for the FT <br />and TT variables, respectively, were found, with substantial statistical support <br />for the FT results and lesser statistical support for the TT results (i.e., P <br />values of 0.01 to 0.09, respectively). Time profiles of FT and TT rainfall com- <br />posited with respect to the time of the initial treatment pass also provided <br />substantial evidence for a treatment effect in FACE-I, with rainfall peaking <br />higher and later in the seeded cases. Analyses of covariance using meteorologi- <br />cally based covariates suggested an even larger effect of seeding than the <br />overall results with stronger statistical support. The FACE-2 experiment was <br />conducted in an effort to confirm the indications of positive seeding effects on <br />rainfall from FACE-I. <br /> <br />FACE-2 was conducted during the summers of 1978, 1979, and 1980. There were 61 <br />days of experimentation of which 10 were A days (days on which less than 60 AgI <br />flares were used) and 51 were B days (days on which 60 or more AgI flares were <br />used). Of the 10 A days, 3 were seed days and 7 were non-seed days. Of the 51 <br />B days, 25 were seed days and 26 were non-seed days. <br /> <br />The confirmatory specifications (Woodley et al., 1982a) and final data sets <br />(Barnston et al., 1982) for FACE-2 were identified prior to any disclosure of <br />the treatment decisions. The confirmatory specifications were: <br /> <br />1. The first and weakest level of confirmation will have been attained <br />if the seed FT and TT rainfall time profiles are greater in magnitude <br />and peak later than the corresponding control rainfall profiles with <br />substantial probability support in the adjusted (for mUltiplicity) P <br />values. Failure to achieve this first level of confirmation preclu- <br />des moving to the second level. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.