Laserfiche WebLink
<br />30 <br /> <br />above conditions, these motions must bE: in the form of buoyant eddies. <br /> <br />The 0000 analysis shows a return toward stable flow with a couple of <br /> <br />closed off isentropes over Camp Hale as the remnants of the 2100 unsta- <br /> <br />ble layer. Summarizing, trajectories through 1800 show smoot~1 orographic <br /> <br />flow while those at 2100 show a distinct mixing layer dying out by 0000. <br /> <br />4.2 The Water Budget <br /> <br />;, <br /> <br />The application of equation (5) to compute the water budget has been <br /> <br />described. This equation was evaluated for all Be channels at six times <br /> <br />and for the following special intervals: Minturn to Camp Hale, Camp <br /> <br />Hale to Fairplay, TOP to Fairplay and Minturn to Fairplay. Elimination <br /> <br />of the downslope evaporation (TOP to Fairplay) from the Camp Hale to <br /> <br />Fairplay intervals results in the synthetic interval Camp Hale to TOP. <br /> <br />Condensation for this interval plus the condensation for the Minturn to <br /> <br />Camp Hale length gives the total net condensation. The results of equa- <br /> <br />tion (5) for Minturn to Fairplay give precipitation. <br /> <br />Figure 13 shows graphically the results of these computations. In <br /> <br />Figure l3a the difference between the CRA-FPY curve and the CRA-TOP curve <br /> <br />is the downslope evaporation (TOP to Fairplay), The solid and the dotted <br /> <br />curves in l3a are summed to give the solid curve in l3b or the total con- <br /> <br />densation. The precipitation is the dotted line in Figure l3b. <br /> <br />With the exception of 0900, the results are in very good qualitative <br /> <br />agreement with the surface observations discussed in section 2.2. In <br /> <br />that section it was pointed out that light precipitation started by 1200, <br /> <br /> <br />stopping briefly, shortly after 1800 and very light and variable snow <br /> <br /> <br />fell from about 2100 to roughly 2300. The 0900 analysis is not valid be- <br /> <br /> <br />cause the wind direction existing at the time does not satisfy the <br />