Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />share computer system. It was an additional near real time precipi- <br />tation monitoring system along with the four real time telemetered <br />precipitation gages the seeding contractor had available. <br /> <br />As with the previous operating season, the operational <br />decision was not locked to the 0900 MST evaluation, but could be <br />adjusted as the weather movl9d in. A storm system which was distant <br />at 0500 MST, but nevertheless threatened to produce precipitation <br />before 1100 MST of the following day, could be more closely examined <br />for timing of the onset of precipitation and the suitability of the cloud <br />system for modification. The experimental day call could be postponed <br />until after the 1700 MST synoptic data had been analyzed. However, no <br />experimental day calls could be made after 2300 MST on any day. Sub- <br />sequently, a forecast of 30 hours in advance of initial data was reduced <br />to 18 hours or less. The forecasters' goal was to declare an experi- <br />mental day at least three hO\llrs prior to the existence of modification <br />potential. <br /> <br />3. 4. 1 Forecast Procedures for Experimental Day Recognition <br />The daily operational procedure and decision making routine <br />(see Figure 3-1) began by hand plotting and analysis of the 700 and 500 <br />mb charts and the surface charts for the 0500 MST data. Upon com- <br />pletion of this effort, an analysis was made of forecast guidance material <br />from the NAFAX circuit, and a brief descriptive prognoses chart of the <br />500 mb level was then made for a 24- hour and 48- hour period. This <br />chart included an assessment of the precipitation probability and the <br />experimental day potential, and was detailed (on the form shown in <br />Figure 3-2) for a forecast period of five days. Following the completion <br />of the above 5-day forecast chart, a detailed picture of criteria para- <br />meters was prepared as shown in Figure 3-3 and 3-4 to include the 500 <br />mb temperature (as a guide to temperature change), the 700 mb wind <br />and a two-dimensional time-(~ross section of the cloud picture and <br />precipitation. With this detailed picture, the specific parameters and <br />the criteria of the recognition forecast were then summarized on the <br />Forecast Work Sheet (Figure 3-5) which included a discussion on the <br />synoptic features and their eUects during the forecast period. Finally, <br />having the summarized forecast parameters and with the experimental <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />II <br />Ii <br />II <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3-5 <br />