Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3. Six-year Program <br /> <br />The 2-year initial phase of this option would immediately apply existing <br />knowledge to design a 4-year dual subbasin demonstration phase. In <br />order to reduce the uncertainty about the frequency of seeding oppor- <br />tunity, storm variability, and seeding mode operations throughout the <br />Basin, two subbasins would be instrumented simultaneously. Basin-wide <br />climatological studies to determine storm types and seeding opportun- <br />ities would be initiated during the initial phase and continued through- <br />out the second phase. <br /> <br />The 4-year second phase would include a randomized seeding program in <br />two subbasins to evaluate and quantify water supply increases and <br />extrapolate this information to the entire Basin. Concurrent studies <br />to improve project instrumentation, seeding modes and agents, would be <br />conducted in preparation for Basin-wide operations. Data required to <br />implement transfer of the technology to the other subbasins of the <br />Colorado River would be collected. <br /> <br />The advantages of this option are that it calls for the earliest <br />initiation of Basin-wide operations, it anticipates increased water <br />supply in two subbasins within 2 years, and it has the lowest total <br />cost of all the options. The disadvantages are that the scientific and <br />social acceptability of the results of the 6-year effort probably will <br />not be at a high enough level of confidence for those concerned with <br />issues of extra-area effects, water rights, and social and environmntal <br />effects to initiate a Basin-wide program. ~ith only 2 years to prepare <br />for 'the demonstration phase, there is no opportunity to improve on <br />existing technology. Also, it may not be possible to complete the <br />needed environmental studies and impact statement in 2 years. This <br />option has the highest average annual costs. <br /> <br />C. Programmatic Alternatives <br /> <br />The Project Skywater Programmatic Final Environmental Statement [2J was filed <br />with the Council on Environmental Quality, October 25, 1977. The State- <br />ment was distributed to State clearinghouses; Federal, State, and local <br />agencies; universities and colleges; special interest organizations; and the <br />general public in the Colorado River Basin. Chapter 8 of the Statement, <br />"Alternatives to the Proposed Action," is incorporated by reference as part <br />of this environmental assessment. The eight programmatic alternatives <br />discussed in the FES in addition to precipitation management are: <br /> <br />- the null or no action alternative <br />- accommodating to projected water shortages <br />- expanded conventional water resoures engineering <br />- geothermal waters <br />- saline waters <br />- interbasin or intrabasin water transfers <br />- water reclaimed through conservation <br />- alternative technologies applicable to the atmospheric water resource <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />