Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CDM <br /> <br />Section 3 <br />Water Use and Forecasted Demands <br /> <br /> 350 <br />S' 300 <br />() <br />c.. <br />-9 250 220 <br />a> <br />en <br />:::J 200 <br />L- <br />a> <br />~ 150 <br />~ <br />c.. 100 <br />ro <br />U <br />L- <br />a> 50 <br />0- <br /> 0 <br /> 2001 <br /> <br />276 <br /> <br /> <br />2002 <br /> <br />2003 <br /> <br />2004 <br /> <br />2005 <br /> <br />2006 <br /> <br />D Potable (Billed and Unbilled) . Raw Water/Leases D Reclaimed Use via Exchange <br /> <br />Figure 3-2 Historical Per Capita Water Use <br /> <br />The increase in water usage following a drought is typical of a drought memory <br />effect. This is illustrated by examining per capita water use for the City of Los <br />Angeles, California. Figure 3-3 shows the per capita demands for Los Angeles from <br />1980 to 2004. <br /> <br /> 200 <br /> 190 <br />C- <br />o 180 <br />f./J <br />Q:i <br />0- <br />~ 170 <br />(IV <br />~ 160 <br />c <br />..Q <br />co 150 <br />~ <br />Q) 140 <br />en <br />:J <br />co 130 <br />:t:::=: <br />0.. <br />ro <br /><..) 120 <br />Q) <br />a... <br /> 110 <br /> 100 <br /> 0 <br /> CD <br /> en <br /> <br /> <br />....' ... <br /> <br />Drought Memory Effect <br /> <br />..... <br /> <br /> <br />""'-tr' <br />C) <br />o <br />c\J <br /> <br />Figure 3-3 Per Capita Use Effect of Drought on Los Angeles <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />3-3 <br /> <br />\\DENSVR1\PROJECTS\9228 - ERIE\CONSERVATION PLAN\REPORT\DRAFT PRIOR TO PUBLIC REVIEW\CONNIE FORMATTED\SECTION 3.DOC <br />