Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Chapter V - Evaluation of Alternatives <br /> <br />Four factors were considered in evaluating the alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Impact on the man-made environment <br />2. Institutional requirements for project implementation <br />3. Technical considerations <br />4. Project costs <br />Impacts associated with the man-made environment, the natural environment, and <br />the existing social structure are common to all of the alternatives, and are discussed <br />below. The technical considerations are similar for all alternatives. The costs and <br />institutional requirements vary between alternatives and are described in detail for <br />each alternative. The following sections describe the project's output/yield, impacts, <br />institutional requirements and costs. Financial feasibility is addressed for the <br />selected alternative in Chapter VI. <br /> <br />A. Impacts <br /> <br />A.1 Man-Made Environmental Impacts <br />There will not be any foreseen environmental impacts to existing dwelling units, <br />commercial facilities, or other structures in the project area, due to the developed <br />alternatives. Impact on utilities and the existing railroad are considered minor and <br />temporary and would exist only during construction. <br /> <br />A.2 Natural Environmental Impacts <br />No wetlands will be impacted during the replacement of the culvert. It is likely that <br />the U.S. Corps of Engineers (USACE) will issue a letter of "no permit required" for <br />the project. <br /> <br />A.3 Social Structure Impacts <br /> <br />There are no foreseen impacts on existing neighborhoods and communities or on <br />employment. The project will allow the social structure in the area to remain intact <br /> <br />')1 <br />