|
<br />Page 1 of:
<br />
<br />Seaholm, Randy
<br />
<br />To: Watt, Joe
<br />Subject: RE: Water
<br />
<br />Joe
<br />
<br />South Platte\Republican
<br />Arkansas
<br />Rio Grande
<br />Gunnison
<br />Colorado Mainstem
<br />Yampa\White
<br />San Juan\Dolores
<br />North Platte
<br />
<br />2000 2030
<br />5.181 5.577
<br />2.502 2.604
<br />2.657 2.662
<br />2.405 2.417
<br />.980 1 .296
<br />1.544 1 .550
<br />1.877 1.900
<br />.397 .504
<br />
<br />;ompacts
<br />
<br />. Yampa\White\ColoradoMainstem\Gunnison\SanJuan\Dolores are governed by the Colorado and
<br />Upper Colorado River Compacts. Colorado is entitled to beneficially consumptively use 51.75% of
<br />the water available to the Upper Basin after allowing for 50,000 AF to Arizona. 7,500,000 - 50,000 =
<br />7,450,000 * .5175 = 3,855,375 AF. However, the most recent hydrologic determination indicates that
<br />only 6,000,000 AF may be available to the Upper Basin long term. 6,000,000 - 50,000 = 5,950,000
<br />* .5175 = 3,079,125. Thus, Colorado can use between 3.079 maf and 3.855 maf, but we are only fairly
<br />certain that 3.079 is available. Colorado is currently using about 2.3 maf with facilities in place to use u~
<br />to 2.6 maf. Thus, there is 479,000 AF that can be developed on the west slope with some certainty.
<br />. On the South Platte, Colorado has the right to and uninterrupted use of all water downstream of
<br />the western boundary of Washington County between October 15th and April 1 st. Between April 1 st
<br />and October 15th of each year Colorado must curtail diversions by water users whos rights are junior to
<br />June 14, 1897 when the flows at stateline are less than 120 cfs.
<br />. The Arkansas River Compact provides for a sharing of water placed into storage in John Martin
<br />Reservoir. Approximately 60% to Colorado and 40% to Kansas.
<br />. On the Republican, Colorado is allocated the benefical consumptive use of 10,000 AF on the
<br />North Fork, 25,400 AF on the South Fork, 15,400 AF on the Arikaree and 3,300 AF on Beaver creek for
<br />a total of 54,100 AF plus the entire supply available on Frenchman and Red Willow. Kansas is allocatee
<br />190,300 AF and Nebraska 234,500 AF.
<br />. On the North Platte, Colorado is limited to the irrigation of 145,000 acres in Jackson County,
<br />storing more than 17,000 AF for irrigation, and exporting more than 60,000 AF in any consecutive 10-
<br />year period.
<br />. On the Laramie, Colorado's uses are limited to 49,375 AF per year.
<br />. On the Rio Grande, the flow out of the mountains is measured at an index station (Rio Grande a
<br />Del Norte, Conejoes at Mogote) and based on that volume, certain amounts must be delivered at the
<br />stateline of confluence of the tributary with the Rio Grande. In high runoff years, upto 70% of the
<br />Conejos flow must be delivered and upto 60% of the Rio Grande index flow. In dry years, the Conejos
<br />has no delivery obligation and the Rio Grande's as little as 25%. Thus, it is often more difficult to compl~
<br />with the compact in wet years. I'll fax you the curves.
<br />. On Costilla Creek, the compact defines a "duty of water" of 1 AF for each 80 acres irrigated and
<br />a calculation of a safe yield prior to each irrigation season and a determination of the length of the
<br />irrigation season.
<br />
<br />~s you can see, each compact is very different. In short, there is water to develop on the west slope as
<br />ndicated. There is also some water to develop on the lower end of the south platte, but that doesn't help
<br />)enver and communities high in the basin. Water development opportunities are very limited in the Arkansas
<br />lnd Rio Grande. Thus, new uses largely come at the expense of eliminating some current use, usually
<br />
<br />10/23/2003
<br />
|