My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Item 13
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
Agenda Item 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:38:40 PM
Creation date
3/31/2008 4:46:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/18/2008
Description
Report of the Attorney General
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 6 <br />of Work for implementation and completion of the project, and drafting the contract with the <br />contractor authorized to image the documents currently in the Commission's library. <br />12. Civil Litigation re~ardin~ the Colorado River <br />The Colorado River Subunit represents the state of Colorado with respect to civil litigation <br />regarding the Colorado River that implicates issues important to the State. Recent examples <br />of such litigation include Consejos de Desarrollo Economico de Mexicali ("CDEM") v. <br />Norton, Appeal Nos. 06-16345, 06-16618, 06-16664 (9`h Cir. 2007) and Center for <br />Biological Diversity v. Bureau of Reclamation, Case No. 3::06-CV-00494 (D. Ariz. 2006). <br />The Colorado River Subunit anticipates representing the state of Colorado in Grand Canyon <br />Trust v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Case No. CV 07-8164-PCT-DGC, environmental <br />litigation recently filed by the Grand Canyon Trust in the U.S. District Court in Arizona that <br />implicates the Bureau of Reclamation's operation of Glen Canyon Dam. <br />The Subunit also monitors federal case law that may create binding precedent regarding <br />interpretation of the Colorado River Compact and the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact. <br />Examples of such litigation are the interstate suits of Montana v. Wyoming and South <br />Carolina v. North Carolina recently filed in the U.S. Supreme Court pursuant to its original <br />jurisdiction. <br />13. Assistance with Colorado River Administration <br />In addition to providing the state of Colorado with legal counsel regarding interstate issues • <br />related to the Colorado River and the Colorado River Compact, the Colorado River Subunit <br />provides legal counsel to the State Engineer and the Department of Natural Resources with <br />respect to intrastate administration of water rights. Specifically, the Subunit assists the State <br />Engineer and the Department of Natural Resources in analyzing state and federal law as <br />applied to proposed water supply projects that involve the waters of the Colorado River <br />Basin. <br />14. Compact Curtailment Rulemaking Research <br />The Subunit assists the State Engineer in addressing legal questions that may arise in the <br />event Colorado must curtail use of Colorado River water pursuant to its compact obligations. <br />Legal issues already addressed include: <br />• The State Engineer's legal authority to administer compact curtailment through <br />promulgation of rules. <br />• The legal process that such compact curtailment rulemaking must follow: <br />• The general requirements of Colorado law on compact curtailment rules. <br />• Description of legal issues implicated by compact administration. <br />The multitude of legal issues still to be addressed fall generally under the following topics <br />for analyses: the parameters and constraints imposed by Colorado law and the Law of the <br />River on compact curtailment administration, possible legal claims and defenses for use in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.