Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 <br />preparation. California has <br />. continues to threaten to fors <br />supplies is not met. This cc <br />of the factual and legal issu <br />possibly relevant document <br />will take several years. <br />In response to this con <br />future Colorado River <br />First, the Subunit prepares egal memoranda researching issues that: may arise in future <br />Colorado River Compact li igation. These memoranda include those prepared in connection <br />with the Basin States negot ations, described above, as well as the i:ollowing topics: <br />• Upper <br />• 70R Surplus <br />a State Board devoted to Colorado River issues. Nevada <br />e reconsideration of the Compact if its need for additional water <br />ncern is heightened by the knowledge that, due to the complexity <br />~s, the number of parties affected, and t:he sheer number of <br />~, adequately preparing for Colorado River Compact litigation <br />the Colorado River Subunit was charged to prepare Colorado for <br />pact litigation. This charge involves three elements. <br />River Commission Finding Authority <br />and <br />• 602(a) <br />Second, the Subunit active <br />the State's Colorado River <br />the State with respect to fu <br />. into the database is stored i <br />searchable by such "object <br />of document, and other sin <br />database is reviewed by a r <br />searchable pursuant to one <br />makes the document searc] <br />provisions within the Law <br />authority represented by th <br />develops and organizes an electronically searchal <br />~cuments. This database is coded and organized s <br />re Colorado River Compact litigation. Each docu <br />word searchable format and coded so .as to make <br />e" information as date, title, author, recipient, org <br />ar information. Finally, every document entered <br />amber of the Subunit and then coded so as to make <br />f four "subjective" outlines. This "subjective" coy <br />ble by the issues addressed, the geographic locati~ <br />the River to which the document is relevant, and <br />document. <br />e database of <br />as to assist <br />lent entered <br />ie document <br />zization, type <br />Ito the <br />the document <br />ng thus <br />i, the <br />ry the type of <br />The Subunit is in the prose s of subjectively coding the documents scanned i~ <br />Colorado River Databases stem. Were Colorado to become involved in any <br />Compact litigation, use oft e database will dramatically reduce litigation pre <br />In addition, the database h already proven useful with respect to Colorado I <br />negotiations and research. ocuments in the database were relied upon in res <br />issues that arose during the Basin States negotiations. The Subunit will Conti: <br />the database in its research egarding compact curtailment rulemakng, negoti <br />Mexico, and interpretation f the Law of the River. <br />Third, the Subunit is worki <br />Division States, and the sta <br />organize an electronically s <br />documents. This has entail <br />Division States to finance a <br />the <br />o River <br />time. <br />dmg to <br />to utilize <br />ns with <br />with the Colorado Water Conservation Board, th'e Upper <br />at the Upper Colorado River Commission to develop and <br />rchable database of the Commission's Colorado River <br />developing a Memorandum of Agreement among the Upper <br />i authorize the "UCRC Imaging Project," preparing the Scope <br />