Laserfiche WebLink
If it succeeded, the proposal would give water agencies from across the acid West a way to tap into the <br />Pacific Ocean without having to shoulder the impractical costs of directly connecting pipes to the ocean. <br />Landa's group would guarantee the water supply to the yet-to-be-identified urban agency, while building <br />and operating the desalination plant, according to a 13-page presentation the developer prepared in March <br />2007. <br />Water transfers and exchanges are common techniques used by water managers across the West, where <br />the rights to water sources can be traded and sold like commodities. The San Diego County Water <br />Authority used a transfer in the 2003 Quantification Settlement Agreement. The authority paid farmers in <br />the Imperial Irrigation District to take less water than they were entitled to from the Colorado River, <br />allowing the authority to use the water instead. <br />The Southern Nevada Water Authority, which provides water to 2 million Las Vegas residents, is <br />interested in the concept of exchanging desalinated water for a larger claim to the Colorado River, <br />spokesman J.C. Davis said. The authority's general manager has signaled an interest in pursuing <br />desalination projects in California or Mexico. <br />Such a plan would not necessarily make sense for the Nevada agency, Davis said. The authority depends <br />on Lake Mead and the Colorado River for 90 percent of its water, and Lake Mead's levels have been <br />dropping. <br />Scientists at Scripps Institution of Oceanography recently projected the reservoir's water levels have a 50- <br />50 chance of being too low to draw water out by 2021. <br />If a project such as Nevagua were successful, Davis said the authority would have "succeeded in putting <br />more eggs in the Colorado River basket. Given a choice, you're trying to get your eggs out of that basket, <br />because it's shrinking." <br />Mexico's share of the Colorado River has been a controversial subject with the United States for decades. <br />The United States and Mexico signed a treaty in 1944 that guaranteed Mexico L~ million acre feet of <br />water from the Colorado each year. (An acre foot is about 326,000 gallons, enough to supply two families <br />for a year.) <br />But as the United States increased its dependence on the Colorado, the water that flowed into Mexico <br />became saltier and seriously declined in quality. The United States eventually agreed in the early 1970s to <br />build a desalination plant in Yuma to improve water quality. The treaty and subsequent negotiations have <br />given Mexico a valuable trading chip as the West faces its predicted dry future. <br />Beyond financing, the project would face numerous hurdles that Landa has highlighted in the <br />presentation: The governments of Mexico and the United States would need to agree to reduce deliveries <br />to Mexico. Landa would have to push the project through the International Boundary and Water <br />Commission, a State Department agency that he has fought with over the Bajagua proposal. <br />The San Marcos-based Bajagua Project calls for building a treatment plant in Mexico to handle 59 million <br />gallons of sewage daily, boosting Tijuana's treatment capacity by 34 million gallons a day while <br />providing a source of reclaimed water. The project would boost the levels of waste pulled out of sewage <br />currently treated in the United States at a San Ysidro plant, aiming to improve the ocean's water quality <br />near the U.S.-Mexico border. Each time it rains, sewage-laden runoff streams down Tijuana's hillsides <br />into the Pacific Ocean. <br />~g~ <br />