Laserfiche WebLink
<br />... <br /> <br />3. Operational Decisions. Neither the "water balance" nor "Kc-ETo" approach is <br />sufficiently accurate to serve alone as the basis for district-wide operational decisions <br />on a day-to-day or week-to-week basis (Le., predicting needed diversions). <br /> <br />4. Efficiency Estimation. Neither of these methods directly give an estimate of irrigation <br />efficiency (IE) or its accuracy. Some additional analyses must be performed to estimate <br />beneficial uses other than ET such as leaching. Methodology for estimating the <br />magnitude of beneficial uses such as leaching and runoff need to be reviewed critically <br />and agreed upon by lID and USBR. <br /> <br />5. Reasonable Practices. Is it justifiable to conclude that current irrigation practices in lID <br />are unreasonable? The answer is no. As Dr. Jensen stated in his report, reasons for the <br />apparent trend of increasing flows to the sea are not known, but further study of <br />"reasonable" and beneficial uses may be necessary. Independent detailed studies of the <br />economics and physical feasibility and reasonableness of modifications to current <br />irrigation practices/infrastructure are required to answer the question posed, and such <br />studies have not yet been done. Conclusions concerning the reasonableness of alternate <br />irrigation practices, and recommendations to change existing practices on the basis of <br />perceived unreasonableness, cannot be justified until such analyses are done. <br /> <br />6. Trends. Is it justifiable to conclude that there is a trend of declining irrigation <br />performance in lID? This question has not yet been answered. While irrigation <br />efficiency estimates for recent years may seem to follow a trend, the data need to be <br />statistically analyzed and appropriate confidence levels assigned before any such <br />conclusion can be made. Until this is done, the existence of statistically valid trends is <br />still an open question. <br /> <br />7. Salton Sea Level Fluctuations. Are changes in lID efficiencies the primary cause of <br />Salton Sea water level fluctuation? It does not appear so. Of course, inflow from lID <br />affects the Salton Sea level. However, as shown by the attached figure, assembled by <br />Dr. Jensen in November, 1996, weather and rainfall have a major impact on changes in <br />the Sea level. Evaporative demand minus rainfall is correlated with, and similar in <br />magnitude to, changes in the Salton Sea level. Dr. Jensen has indicated that Figure 2.2 <br />and associated comments regarding the Salton Sea found in the Jensen report would be <br />rewritten if done today. <br /> <br />8. Indications of Accuracy. Is it reasonable to draw conclusions from year-to-year <br />changes in efficiency? The answer is no, unless ~ statistical analyses, which were <br />not included in the Jensen report, are performed. Our ability to understand the lID <br />hydrologic system and to draw conclusions must be tempered by our ability to quantify <br />and verify both trends in, and magnitudes of, various w~ter volumes and irrigation <br />performance indicators. Therefore, estimates of values or performance indicators <br />should always be accompanied by an indication of accuracy (Le., by confidence <br />intervals). <br />