My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12981
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP12981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:28 PM
Creation date
3/31/2008 12:24:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20.C
Description
Imperial Irrigation District (IID);
State
CA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Author
IID
Title
Imperial Irrigation District News Releases
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />9. Conservation Programs. Can one make conclusions concerning the effectiveness of <br />water conservation programs by examining only annual changes and trends in <br />diversions? The answer is no. When assessing the effectiveness of a water <br />conservation program, it is tempting to rely on a comparison of annual diversions. <br />However, this is problematic since small reductions in water use brought on by the <br />program may be lost in larger year-to-year variations, or uncertainties in annual values, <br />or other over-riding trends (such as weather, crop shifts, insect pressure). Therefore one <br />of the following approaches is more likely to be useful: <br />(a) Engineering studies of what would have happened if the conservation <br />practices had not been in place. <br />(b) Water use efficiency studies (changes in yield per unit of water diverted). <br />Both approaches are difficult and expensive to implement. <br /> <br />10. Immediate Need for Change? Is it justifiable to conclude that there is an immediate <br />need to implement improved on-farm systems and practices in lID? The answer is no. <br />After review and discussion, we agree that there is insufficient evidence to conclude, as <br />stated in the Jensen report, that in lID "... the ratio of beneficial uses of water to supply <br />have decreased indicating an immediate need to implement improved on-farm systems <br />and practices including more effective irrigation scheduling." <br /> <br />/'l"'~.// ?$~ d'':~~,:-/:..v/ <br /> <br />. "fO*"'~ ~...~. --0..-_-. .", !I' ",_; <br /> <br />c;;21v<?JA~ <br /> <br />r )Richard G. Allen <br />Professor of Irrigation <br />Department of Biological & <br />Irrigation Engineering <br />Utah State University <br />Logan, Utah <br /> <br />Dr. Charles M. Burt <br />Professor and Director <br />Irrigation Training & Research Center <br />Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo <br /> <br />~/ya <br /> <br />Dr. Alo'ert J. Clemmens <br />Research Hydraulic Engineer <br />US Water Conservation Laboratory <br />USDA! ARS <br />Phoenix, AZ <br /> <br />~ ~~~ <br /> <br />Dr. Kenneth H. Solomon <br />Professor and Department Head <br />BioResource & Agricultural Engineering <br />Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo <br /> <br />attached: <br /> <br />Graphs <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.