Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 3.9 Flow Recommendation Primary Statistics Compared To Baseline and <br />Maximum Impact NGWSP Statistics <br /> <br /> <br />Recurrence Frequency <br />>10,000 cfs for 5 days 20.0% 27.7% <br />>8,000 cfs for 10 days 33.0% 38.5% <br />>5,000 cfs for 21 days 50.0% 50.8% <br />>2,500 cfs for 10 days 80.0% 80.0% <br />Maximum Years Without Meeting Criteria <br /> <br />27.7% <br />38.5% <br />55.4% <br />80.0% <br /> <br />> 9,700 cfs for 5 days 10 10 <br />> 7,760 cfs for 10 days 6 6 <br />> 4,850 cfs for 21 days 4 4 <br />> 2,450 cfs for 10 days 2 2 <br /> <br />10 <br />6 <br />4 <br />2 <br /> <br />Table 3.10 Change in Average Annual Streamflow from Baseline to Maximum Impact <br />Configurations at Five San Juan River Gages <br /> <br />.. .Change'.. c~cf~.~.}c::,..:.~~-:;-;c-~'~f'Arc1iljie~lccJ=arn1ingtoif~.SlliP_1.~t.-.=biit'-CO"iHIi~~;;~Brlitf <br />Average monthly - cfs 42 41 -8 -5 -5 <br />Maximum monthly - cfs 81 64 26 29-54 <br />Minimum monthly - cfs 0 3 0 -9 -1 <br />Average monthly - % 5.5% 2.8% -0.5% -0.3% -0.3% <br />Maximum monthly - % 3.6%; 1.6% 0.6% 0.6% -0.9% <br />t",1inimum monthly - % 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% -1.5% -0.2% <br /> <br />\Vhen the sum of annual depletions from :\IIP and ALP reaches 290,000 acre-feet, it is proposed <br />that total depletions in the basin be monitored and reported by the SJRIP Hydrology Committee <br />every 5 years until the baseline depletion is reached. At that point, modeling would be <br />completed for the limits the I\avajo Nation would propose putting in place to meet flow <br />recommendations. No modifications of operating rules are proposed until the method of meeting <br />the depletion guarantee is fmalized and the model runs are completed to determine the needed <br />operating criteria. The Navajo Nation would then implement the limitations necessary to keep <br />basin depletions under the baseline depletion unless future consultations, a change in flow <br />recommendations or change in species status remove the requirement for such guarantee. <br /> <br />\"'hen diversions for the NG\VSP begin at the P1\TM weir, it is proposed that the method used to <br />calculate flow in the critical habitat for Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker be modified <br />by subtracting the ~G\VSP diversion at the P:t\T}..f weir from the gage reading at Farmington <br />before calculating the average flow in the river. This is consistent with the modeling approach <br />used and will maintain the minimum flow below the P:N~ weir at pre-project levels or greater. <br /> <br />BIOLOGICAL ASSESSr..1ENT <br />NAVAJO GALLUP WATER SUPPLY PROJECT <br />September 3. 2004 <br /> <br />Page 24 <br />