Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The total depletion for this analysis is about 1,200 acre-feet greater than the baseline plus <br />depletions allowed in Part 1 while still meeting the flow recommendations. This represents the <br />maximum combined development potential for the Navajo Nation while meeting flow <br />recommendations under full baseline depletion conditions. Since this is greater than that allowed <br />under Pan 2, implementation of Part 2 of the commitment in this section is conselVative in favor <br />of the flow recommendations. <br /> <br />3.3.3 Summary <br /> <br />The proposed implementation of the NG\VSP increases depletion over the baseline presented in <br />Table 3.2 by 1,840 acre-feet. Until depletions in the basin, including the full depletion for <br />KG\VSP, reach the baseline depletion in Table 32 plus 1,840 acre-feet added to the baseline for <br />the ~G'VSP, the flow recommendations can be met and the impact to hydrology from operation <br />of this project will remain at or below that previously considered to be acceptable in Section 7 <br />Consultations. When the total depletion reaches this new baseline depletion, the Navajo Nation <br />will reduce ~a\'ajo depletion from one or more projects that are presently in the baseline such <br />that total depletions in the basin remain below the baseline depletion, assuming all other users <br />are within their baseline depletion. All flow recommendations are met under this case. <br /> <br />The most extreme case analyzed requires reduction of NIIP from 270,000 acre-feet to 247,000 <br />acre- feet of equilibrium depletion and the release of 40 ciS down Ojo Amarillo under certain <br />:\"avajo Dam release patterns. The hydrologic conditions for this scenario have been compared <br />to those conditions that result from the baseline depletion represented in Table 3.2. This case is <br />used as the maximum impact against the baseline case. Table 3.9 compares the flow statistics for <br />the t\\c-o cases. All flow recommendations are met and the impact to flow statistics is equal to or <br />less than all baseline values. <br /> <br />Table 3.10 presents the change in flow from baseline to the maximum impact case at the five San <br />Juan River gauges below Navajo dam. Details are in Appendix A. In general. the average flows <br />are increased downstream from I\avajo Dam to the PN~f diversion below Farmington to supply <br />water to this lower diversion point for the project. Below PNM the flows are reduced by an <br />average of 8 cfs until rerum flow enters below Shiprock where the reduction averages 5 cfs and <br />continues at this rate downstream past the Bluff gage. The decrease typically occurs during the <br />base flow months, with an increase during runoff months (see Appendili: A). The winter months <br />typically see an average decrease in the range of 15 to 20 cfs or about 1.5 to 2.0% below the <br />PNy1 weir. The maximum decrease in monthly average flow occurs in July (37 cfs, 3 % at <br />Shiprock. from Appendix A). At some gages, panicularly upstream of the Pl'i'"M diversion, there <br />is a significant increase in flow, but the decreases in flow that occur in some months and some <br />stations below the P~"1vf diversion are insignificant. <br /> <br />BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT <br />NAVAJO GALLUP WATER SUPPLY PROJECT <br />September 3. 2004 <br /> <br />Page 23 <br />