My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00319
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:35:57 PM
Creation date
3/25/2008 1:20:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
North American Interstate Weather Modification Council - Fiscal Year 2009 Request
Prepared By
McClintock Associates, Inc.
Date
1/1/2007
Weather Modification - Doc Type
General Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />-"-C":"-- <br />~T-' :< <br />. ,'. <br /> <br />:~':---::;, - -'~'---:- -. <br /> <br />North American Interstate Weather Modification Council <br />www.nalwmc.org <br /> <br />"Facilitating the exchange of interstate/interprovincial atmospheric <br />resource management information. " <br /> <br />Answers to Frequently Asked Questions about <br />Cloud Seeding to Augment Mountain Snowpacks* <br /> <br />Q. Does cloud seeding for snowpack augmentation really work? <br />A. Yes! The Weather Modification Association, World Meteorological Organization (WMO), American <br />Meteorological Society (AMS) and the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) all state that there is strong evidence <br />for seasonal precipitation increases over natural precipitation. The AMS further states that increases of about <br />10% are feasible. To achieve such increases, well-designed and conducted projects must be operated on a long- <br />term and continuing basis, not just during droughts. Such projects will help fill reservoirs for use during times of <br />greater need, such as droughts. Experiments in Colorado, Montana and Australia showed statistically significant <br />1-2-3 <br />increases of 10% or greater ' , . <br /> <br />Q. What are the environmental and health effects of seeding material and its effect on clouds and <br />precipitation? <br />A. Minimal. The most common seeding material, silver iodide, is used in very minute amounts. The typical <br />concentration of silver in rainwater or snow from a seeded cloud is less than 0.1 microgram per liter (one part in <br />10,000,000,000). This is well below the acceptable concentration of 50 micrograms per liter, set by the U. S. <br />Public Health Service. Many regions have much higher concentrations of silver in the soil than are found in <br />precipitation from seeded clouds. The concentration of iodine in iodized salt used on food is far above the <br />concentration found in precipitation from a seeded storm. National Environmental Policy Act compliance for all <br />cloud seeding environmental impacts has been demonstrated by past studies. The Bureau of Reclamation <br />(Reclamation) extensively studied environmental and health impacts4;s:6. The toxicity of silver and silver <br />compounds (from silver iodide) was shown to be of low order. According to Reclamation, the tiny amounts of <br />silver used in cloud seeding are 100 times less than industry emissions into the atmosphere in many parts of the <br />country, or individual exposure from tooth fillings. Accumulations in the soil, vegetation, and surface runoff have <br />not been large enou~h to measure above natural background7. A 1995 environmental assessment in the Sierra <br />Nevada of California and a 2004 study in Australia confirmed these earlier findings. <br /> <br />Q. What are the impacts of additional snow? <br />A. An environmental assessment report in Californias investigated the impacts of an assumed weather <br />modification-induced precipitation increase of 5 - 7.5% on weather elements, hydrologic and physiographic <br />phenomena, plant and animal communities, the human environment, and land and water resource use. The report <br />concluded that there would be no significant impact on these environmental sectors. The percentage increases <br />from weather modification are much smaller than inter-annual variability of natural precipitation, which can be <br />several hundred percent9. Research conducted in the Uinta Mountains of Utah indicated that "An increase of 10% <br />in the average snowpack is estimated to prolong the 75% snow-free date by 0.7-1.5 days"lO. An exhaustive five- <br />year ecological studyll in the San Juan Mountains of Colorado concluded that..... there should be no immediate, <br />large-scale impacts on the terrestrial ecosystems of these mountains following an addition of up to 30 percent of <br />the normal snowpack..." Furthermore, all operating projects in the Western U.S. have suspension criteria <br />designed to stop cloud seeding anytime there is a flood threat. Additionally, water management personnel from <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.