My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
March 11 08 South Platte Basin Roundtable Meet
CWCB
>
Basin Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
March 11 08 South Platte Basin Roundtable Meet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:57:05 PM
Creation date
3/24/2008 3:41:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
South Platte
Title
March 08 Minutes
Date
3/11/2008
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Request: Need up to $400,000 but we are asking for $200,000 in order to <br />complete construction costs; <br />Jerke: Little Thompson runs dry every summer, why? <br />Do to upstream user: Big Elk Meadows; geology. <br />Harold Evans: In your write up: amlual yield of 36 acft; thus, if you spend <br />$4 million, cost of over $112,000 per acre feet. Record cost. <br />This is total project cost. <br />3) Bert Weaver: Clear Creek County Planning Director; agent <br />representing Upper Mountain Counties: Clear Creek, Gilpin, <br />Jefferson and Park Counties (See application emailed from IBCC on <br />Tuesday, March 4) (See minutes from January and February <br />meetings) <br />Weaver distributes IGA among counties--Weaver introduces Hal Simpson <br />who has worked with Upper Mountain Counties, Simpson works with <br />CDM. <br />Requesting: $130,763 from South Platte Roundtable; $43,587 from Metro <br />Roundtable: Total: 173, 350 <br />Will be presenting in front of Metro Roundtable on Wednesday for 1/4ti' of <br />funding; has presented in January to both South Platte and Metro, <br />See page 13 in Grant Application for Scope of Work: <br />Divided in four sections: looking to come up with assessment for long <br />term assessment in groundwater in fractured granite; how are counties <br />projecting growth, what is zoning of unplotted areas; if these are all built <br />out by 2050, can we anticipate a sustainable water supply. Using a study <br />of USGS of Turkey Creek; study author opines that this study approach <br />makes sense; he will be used as an advisory committee; end result will be <br />a series of maps showing where there will be problems or where there will <br />not be problems. <br />Questions: <br />Harold Evans: Split between Metro and South Platte: this based on Jeff <br />Co: 1/4ti'to Jeff Co? Hal: yes. <br />Matching from Counties is $8,000 plus in-kind? Yes. <br />Bert Weaver: Per Sherman Harris: Colorado's mountain counties will see <br />highest growth on a percentage basis. <br />Janet Bell: Re: to respond on in-kind: Jeff Co has spent $650,000 on the <br />Turkey Creek study, but we have 10 years of data already gathered. Needs <br />assessment is primary source. <br />Jerke: Jeff Co rep? <br />Janet: Jolu7 Wolforth, Planning Director, Jefferson County Planning and <br />Zoning District; Walt and I were involved in drafting the scope of work <br />and now there is a sluff of the work; Jolu1 has just returned from vacation; <br />will be new rep on Roundtable. <br />Ralf Topper: Scope of work in Park County? Limited to east side of <br />Kenosha; also what about miiung impact? <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.