My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Colorado - Grand County Stream Flow Mgmt Plan Phase III_Water Activity Summary
CWCB
>
WSRF Grant & Loan Information
>
DayForward
>
ARK - GUNNISON
>
Colorado - Grand County Stream Flow Mgmt Plan Phase III_Water Activity Summary
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2012 2:31:15 PM
Creation date
3/13/2008 2:32:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
WSRA Grant and Loan Information
Basin Roundtable
Colorado
Applicant
Grand County
Description
Grand County Stream Flow Management Plan - Phase III
Account Source
Basin
Board Meeting Date
5/21/2008
Contract/PO #
150461
WSRA - Doc Type
Water Activity Summary Sheet - CWCB Evaluation/Approval Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Utilizing cross sectional surveys develop a hydraulic model (HEC RAS) for restoration sites. <br />Contractor shall perform a hydraulic and geomorphic assessment as outlined below. The goal of this <br />analysis is to identify meandering, braided and transitional reaches of the river, assess trends in the <br />study reach and estimate impacts of the proposed river restoration improvements on the river’s <br />geomorphology. <br /> <br /> <br />?Survey approximately 100 river cross sections and develop the HECRAS model. <br /> <br /> <br />?Using hydrologic conditions prepared in Task 3.4.1 develop a HECRAS for the existing conditions <br />for the representative 1.5-year, 2-year, 10-year and 100-year return interval peak flows. <br /> <br /> <br />?Evaluate at each project site the hydraulic conditions and calculate hydraulic parameters for the <br />discharges noted above. <br /> <br /> <br />?Collect and analyze stream bed material gradations. For the purpose of this analysis six sites will <br />be selected with one sample taken from each site for a total of six samples. <br /> <br /> <br />?Review hydraulic characteristics, bed material and other characteristics to compare with typical <br />procedures to determine stream parameters. Review river reaches for trends in meandering, <br />transitional or braided sections. <br /> <br /> <br />?Determine incipient motion sediment sizes for each reach for the range of flows extending up to the <br />100-year peak based on average-reach parameters. The sizes moving should be compared with the <br />bed material distributions to evaluate the percent of the bed mobilized at various flow levels and to <br />identify any potential deposition zones that would be more prone to braiding. <br /> <br /> <br />?Review available thalweg and/or water surface profiles to identify if there is a change in gradient <br />that might tend to result in sediment deposition or degradation. Review available surveyed cross <br />section information for developing a comparative assessment of the river sections relative to each <br />other and relative to changes over time. <br /> <br />3.4.3 Master Plan Drawings <br /> <br />Develop and prepare design to 35% level of detail for the selected restoration. Specific tasks to be <br />performed for each project area are described below. <br /> <br /> <br />?Prepare base maps using the aerial photos from Phases 1 and 2 and superimposing the cross <br />sectional surveys and information from PHABSIM surveys. <br /> <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.