Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br /> 0,1 <br /> 2.5 <br /> 2,0 <br />;;- 1,5 <br />E <br />..... <br />2 <br />Co) 1.0 <br />~ <br />oJ <br /> 0.5 <br /> 5% <br /> 0,0 <br /> 0,1 <br /> <br /> <br />DISTANCE (n mil <br />10 100 <br /> <br />SUMMER <br />MONTANA <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />DISTANCE (km) <br /> <br />Fig. 2.12: The percentage of cases in which the liquid water content, <br />averaged over the indicated distance, exceeded the indicated values, <br />for the measurements from Montana in summertime. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />water contents per hour of flight (Fig. 2.13). The figure shows that, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />during about 10% of the flight hours, we flew through l-km regions <br /> <br />which had average liquid water contents exceeding 1.5 g/m3. <br /> <br />In an <br /> <br />average flight (lasting about 4 hrs) we would normally not expect to <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />encounter such a high average liquid water content in this area; this <br /> <br />is in marked contrast to our experience in Florida, for example, where <br /> <br />such liquid water contents were encountered on every flight. The liquid <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />water content available in the region just above the freezing level is <br /> <br />thus relatively low in comparison to the values that would be desirable <br /> <br />if dynamic seed ing were to be attempted, since glaciation of such <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />liquid water contents could result in an increase in buoyancy of only <br /> <br />a fraction of a degree. The magnitudes of the liquid water content are <br /> <br />also low in compar ison to the levels that support vigorous <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />. <br />