Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Along these lines a preliminary study that had been <br />conducted in April, 1982 found only 12% of the snowpack <br />sampled contained silver concentrations significantly above <br />the natural background level. This number of significant <br />samples was on the low side of results found in a similar <br />investigation conducted in the Truckee-Tahoe Project in the <br />Central Sierra Nevada (~). The project using similar seed- <br />ing technology found that up to 30% of the samples collected <br />during seeded storms contained significant silver. <br /> <br />Two problems were noted in the April, 1982 Utah study. <br />They were: (1) times of sampling; and (2) locations of <br />sampling. In regard to (1) it was noted that the snow pro- <br />files were collected late in the 1981-82 season. It is <br />possible that this late in the season, some snowmelt had <br />already occurred. The densities of these samples were rela- <br />tively high, indicative of an aging snowpack and problems <br />with recrystallization and dry deposition were considered of <br />possible importance. <br /> <br />With regard to (2), trajectory modeling work of Elliot: <br />and others for this area suggests that the seeding aerosols <br />may 'we11 have their greatest effect on the next plateau to <br />the east. This plateau is approximately 20-30 miles down- <br />wind of where the 1982 samples had been collected. There- <br />fore, it was recommended that future programs should involve <br />collection times closer to actual dates of snowfall and <br />include collections from more easterly sites. <br />