Laserfiche WebLink
<br />II. POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF TNEATHER MODIFICATION <br /> <br />The net benefit of weather moditication is a function of the magnitude of <br />the change, when and where it occurs, and how well it can be forecast. <br />Beneficiaries and losers must be identified with regard to socioeconomic and <br />ecological impacts to evaluate its net national and regional value. Because <br />of scientific uncertainty about the effectiveness of weather modification <br />technologies, current estimates ~f the economic value of weather modification <br />can only be approximate. Proper assessment of the value of weather <br />modification also requires consideration of alternative measures: rarely is <br />the choice simply between weather modification and a passive acceptance of <br />whatever nature provides. <br /> <br />There are five major classes of potential weather modification <br />beneficiaries: (1) agriculture, (2) energy, (3) municipalities and <br />industries, (4) human safety and welfare, and (5) transportation. In <br />addition, weather modification can enhance recreational (especially water- <br />based) opportunities, fish and wildlife habitats, air and water quality, and <br />the general quali ty of life. <br /> <br />Agriculture may w~l have the most at stake in weather modification; it <br />is affected by rain, hail, wind, and temperature. A recent study estimated <br />that nearly $13 billion (19721dollars) is lost annually because of unfavorable <br />weather in the United States. Sixty-five percent of this loss is borne by <br />agriculture (table 11-1). <br /> <br />Quantitative estimates of the potential reduction in such losses by cloud <br />seeding are difficult to make and must be viewed with caution. Nevertheless, <br />the magnitude of weather-induced losses is so great that substantial economic <br />incentive a~ists for developing effective modification techniques. <br /> <br />Precipitation enhancement can be used to increase the amount of water <br />stored in reservoirs (surface or underground. manmade or natural). The water <br />is then available when and where it is needed. Assuming that a reliable <br />technology is developed. a basin-wide precipitation enhancement progr~ could, <br />for eKample. increase the flow in the Colorado River by 1.7 billion m . <br />Indeed, a comprehensive water resource study recently concluded: "Taking into <br />consideration availability. quantity. quality. and cost of augmentation <br />alternatives, weather modification appeazs to be the most promising source of <br />new water in the Western United States." Additional water would benefit not <br />only agriculture but also hydroelectric energy production, water quality. and <br />municipalities and industries. <br /> <br />IThompson, J., '"'Living With Climate Change: Phase II Symposium Report," Mitre <br />Corporation, Reston, VA.. pp. 65-76, 1977. <br /> <br />2U.S. Depart!llent of the Interior, "Critical Water Problems Facing the Ele'len <br />Western States." Bureau of Reclamation, Engineering and Research Center, <br />Den'ler, Colo., April 1975. <br /> <br />.. <br />- I - <br />