My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150240 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
0001-1000
>
C150240 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2015 2:10:33 PM
Creation date
3/4/2008 10:53:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150240
Contractor Name
Bull Creek Reservoir, Canal & Power Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Mesa
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ll <br />, <br />the value engineering and cost review was specific to rehabilitation and enlargement of <br />, Reservoir No. 4. This was further refined in a design and review "team meeting" November 2, <br />2006 which included Garrett Jackson (Dam Safety Engineer), E&C Services, the Bull Creek <br />, design team, and the President of the Company. This resulted in providing a range of costs <br />from $1.0 to $1.3 million, with the belief being that the lower end of the range is more <br />' representative of the current cost of design, permitting, construction, and construction <br />management. Also at this meeting, it was decided costs could be saved by going back to the <br />' original design concept of 2003/2004 of buttressing the downstream side of the dam; not <br />disturbing or minimizir�g disturbance to the upstream face of the dam; riprapping based on a <br />weight based specific;ation rather than size based (to take advantage of on-site riprap <br />materials); changing tFne outlet from a replacement to lining of the existing outlet; and placing a <br />chimney drain on portions of the existing downstream face of the dam vs. using a drainage <br />blanket underneath th�e downstream toe. A thorough discussion of the options and costs is <br />included in the Appendices. <br />Rehabilitating and enlarging Reservoir No. 4 to an active storage of 418 acre feet is the <br />Selected Alternative. No Action is unacceptable since it means the Reservoir Company could <br />not deliver sufficient water to its shareholders, would lose senior water rights (a valuable asset), <br />and would have reduced crops and crop failure. <br />"75% DESIGN" PLANS and CONSTRUCTION LEVEL FINANCING COST ESTIMATES <br />Design plans have been prepared by Water Resource Consultants, LLC and are included in <br />Appendix D. Two construction level financing cost estimates and schedule assessments were <br />prepared by E&C Senrices, LLC. The first were based on review of 15% design plans for the <br />project, while the sec�nd takes into account design changes and concepts developed at a <br />project team meeting in early November. Both are included in Appendix D. Consensus on the <br />estimated cost of the project is $1,335,000, as summarized in Table 2. <br />5 The proposed enlargement: of 105.31 AF will be provided by transfer of water rights from Reservoirs Nos. 1 and 2 <br />or by junior water rights. The Company is working with legal counsel, Water Division 5 and the Attorney Generals <br />Office to facilitate storage rights. <br />Bull Creek Reservoir, Canal and Power Company <br />Bull Creek Reservoir No. 4, Feasibility Study <br />Nov. 30, 2006 <br />Page 6 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.