Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />The purpose of this study is to provide a basis for the South Side Reservoir <br />Company to develop strategy to continue providing irrigation water to 265 <br />shareholders in a safe and efficient manner. This study examines the feasibility <br />of alternatives for rehabilitation of the outlet works and resolution of spillway <br />issues of the South Side Reservoir Dam necessary to improve dam safety and <br />allow storage restrictions to be lifted. <br /> <br />The existing dam and reservoir (AKA Bud Mielke Reservoir) was built in 1905 and <br />consists of the earthen embankment, which also serves as a county road, a <br />spillway and the 16" diameter steel outlet with a "center of the dam" gate <br />chamber. The gate chamber is in the county road and presents a hazard to <br />traffic. Two issues significant to the safety of the dam must be addressed. <br /> <br />The first issue is the adequacy of the spillway. Based on The State Engineer's <br />Office (SEO) hydrologic calculations, the dam was restricted on July 7, 1978 due <br />to inadequate spillway capacity. A recently completed hydrologic study has been <br />approved by the State Engineer's Office. The essence of this study is that the <br />spillway must pass the 1 DO-year inflow flood safely. The study indicated that the <br />spillway lacked approximately 0.4 feet of required freeboard to allow the spillway <br />to function properly during the 1 DO-year flood event. This issue must be <br />addressed to assure the safety of the Dam and to allow the SEO to consider <br />lifting the restriction on the storage capacity of the reservoir. <br /> <br />The second issue is the structural integrity of the outlet works. The service life <br />expected of the steel pipe in the outlet works and gate shaft is considered to be <br />50-years. The outlet is approaching 1 DO-years of time in service. The outlet <br />works needs a thorough internal investigation and rehabilitation or replacement. <br /> <br />Alternatives to address these problems and to improve the safety of the dam <br />have been given consideration and are described as follows: <br />4 <br />