Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Holbrook's reservoirs. The Holbrook Canal has direct flows and storage water rights and it <br />participates in the winter storage program. Holbrook's reservoirs generally fill every year. The Fort <br />Lyon and Holbrook by-laws do not allow carryover storagl:l by shareholders; therefore, CWPDA will <br />need to obtain by-laws changes in both companies. The best option probably would be to acquire <br />the Holbrook Canal as the primary supply and acquire the right to store water in Fort Lyon's Adobe <br />Creek Reservoir. <br /> <br />Another option is for CWPDA to promote the increased use of Fry-Ark Project water as a <br />means of decreasing well pumping. An analysis was performed to determine the impact a reduction <br />in irrigation well pumping and increase in Fry-Ark diversions had on stream depletions and Fry-Ark <br />return flows. The analysis included only those ditches on the Arkansas River that historically have <br />taken Fry-Ark Project Water and assumed only CWPDA members would participate. The analysis <br />assumed that well pumping would be replaced by Fry-Ark Project water delivered to the irrigator in <br />the same amount as the reduction in well pumping. The cessation of pumping would result in a <br />0.36 acre-foot reduction in stream depletions. The additional Fry-Ark diversion would generate 0.49 <br />acre-foot of return flow of which CWPDA should be entitled to 0.22 acre-foot. The option makes <br />economical sense. It reduces the amount of water CWPDA needs to purchase and generates <br />additional inexpensive augmentation water. Depending upon the cost of purchasing water, the cost <br />savings can be from $4 to $70 per acre-foot. Then:l are several institutional and personal <br />preferences inhibiting' this option. They include irrigators who like the independence and <br />convenience of turning wells on and off, and most canal companies do not make specific deliveries <br />to individuals under their canal. It is recommended that this option be explored with CWPDA <br />members, SECWCD, and a specific canal company. <br /> <br />It is in CWPDA's best interest to encourage Arkansas River ditch companies to increase their <br />diversion of Fry-Ark Project water. If CWPDA decides not to go forward with the above option,at <br />the very least CWPDA should approach selected ditch companies and try to develop mutually <br />beneficial plans for increasing diversions. <br /> <br />Proposed Auamentation Plan <br />This study analyzed CWPDA's well pumping, stream depletions, and 27 different sources of <br />replacement water. It is opined that the replacement sources listed in Table 1-3 would provide the <br />best combination to offset CWPDA depletions during an average period. <br /> <br /> <br />CWPDA: Sec I <br /> <br />10/19/99 <br /> <br />Page 7 . <br />