Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />a property than a similar, substitute property would cost. This approach considers actual sales of similar <br />properties that have occurred in the market place based upon investigation of the buyers, sellers, fInancing, <br />and properties conveyed. <br /> <br />Application of the Market Data Approach requires verifIcation, comparison, and rating of the <br />subject property once sales prices are reduced to common denominators. Since no two properties are <br />identical, adjustments must be made to accurately compare other sales to the subject property. This <br />approach is the most direct method for estimating value. <br /> <br />The valuation ofreal estate with improvements that add little or nothing to the overall value is best <br />accomplished by the Market Data Approach, that relies on the direct comparison of similar sales. <br />Adjustments are made for various factors that influence value and an overall rating is assigned each <br />property. After fInal analysis, an estimate of value is made. In this report, we conclude that the Market <br />Data Approach is the best means to estimate the value of the Keesee Ditch Water Rights. We have found <br />enough reliable market information to provide a range of values to reflect the water rights' value. We <br />believe this information provides the best indication of value. <br /> <br />The general process used in this report was to investigate sales ofland with water rights and sales <br />, <br />of water rights alone. When a sale involved land and water, the sale price was broken down between lands <br />irrigated with surface w~ter, lands irrigated with well water, pasture land, improvements, and any other <br />components of value. <br /> <br />To determine the value of surface water to irrigate one acre, the per-acre price of the irrigated land <br />was reduced by the value of the residual dry-up land. The resulting value wa'5 taken to be the value of one <br />acre-foot of irrigation water. The per-acre value for the irrigation water was multiplied by the number of <br />irrigated acres to get the total value of the water. The total value of the water was divided by the average <br />consumptive use of the water right, resulting in a value per acre-foot of consumptive use. <br /> <br />After diligent research and investigation of market activity in the area, the authors have completed <br />information on the sales ~t are contained in this report. These sales have been directly compared to the <br />Keesee Ditch Water Rights providing a sound basis to estimate value by the Market Data Approach. <br /> <br />Many of the comparable sales in this appraisal involved only shares of stock in mutual ditch <br />companies, including LA WMA. For the sales of shares, the per-share average consumptive use was <br />divided into the per-share cost. This resulted in a value per acre-foot of consumptive use for the water <br />rights purchased. <br /> <br />B. The Capitalization of Income Approach <br /> <br />Valuation using the Capitalization ofIncome Approach relies on the principle that the value of a <br />property or right is created by the expectation offuture benefits associated with its ownership. These <br />benefIts are generally related to the anticipated net income stream over the remaining useful life of the <br /> <br />Page 24 of 66 <br />