My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ01922 (2)
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
PROJ01922 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:25:16 AM
Creation date
2/21/2008 4:16:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150126
Contractor Name
Kremmling, Town of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
50
County
Grand
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Approval Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />In addition to direct flow rights, the Town has a 139 acre-foot storage right in Jones No.2 <br />Reservoir. Annually, the Town draws from the reservoir with the anticipation of a reservoir refilling in <br />the spring. However, the Sheep Creek basin has a less then adequate water supply to meet current <br />demands, much less future demands for the Town and the Ranch. Given the uncertainty of water supply <br />from the Sheep Creek basin and given current drought conditions, the Town initiated steps to develop an <br />alternate water supply that would meet their current and future water needs. <br /> <br />One of the first actions taken by the Town in this process was to analyze the quality of the two <br />(2) available water sources in the surrounding area ~ the Colorado River and Muddy Creek. Water from <br />. Muddy Creek demoustrated high hardness and sulfate levels. Had this source been selected, it would <br />have required major changes to the existing treatment processes. Accordingly, this alternative was <br />removed from further consideration. The Town attempted to drill wells withiri the Colorado River <br />alluvium. Unfortunately, their efforts were unsuccessful in providing a cost-effective yield. In addition, <br />there was considerable evidence available to suggest that well water would be high in Iron and <br />Manganese _ again necessitating a change in the existing treatment process. Based on the information <br />obtained on the various water sources, it was determined that the Colorado River was the be:st short and <br />long term supplemental water source for the Town. <br /> <br />In October of 2002 the Town provided a feasibility report to the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board, prepared by R.T.W. Engineering, the Applegate Group and the Town, to construct a new raw water <br />supply system from the Colorado River to Jones No.2 Reservoir. <br /> <br />Table 1 below is a brief summary of the major project elements and their estimated cost as <br />presented in the original feasibility study: <br /> <br />Table 1. Pro.iect Cost Summary <br /> <br />Item Estimated Cost <br />1. Mobilization $89,824 <br />2. Low Lift PumP Station $274,000 <br />3. Low Lift Forcemain $256,268 <br />4. Hi Lift PumP Station $320,000 <br />5. Hi Lift Forcemain $312,631 <br />6. Demoblization $11 ,228 <br />Subtotal: (Construction Only) $1,263,951 <br />7. Engineering/2esign/Const. Management $168,891 <br />8. Permitting $28,000 <br />9. Water purchaseIW ater Court $125,000 <br />Total: (Completed Pro_iect) $1,769,420 <br /> <br />The original feasibility study cost estimate was based on constructing 12,000 linear feet of 12- <br />inch HDPE pipe from the Colorado River to Jones No.2 Reservoir, in conjunction with installing a low <br />lift pump station at the river and a high lift pump station closer to the reservoir. <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planninl~ and Financing · Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. COll5ervation Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.