Laserfiche WebLink
come up with plan; plan includes cost estimates so that we are <br />prepared to subnut application. <br />Draft: SWSI study in 2003 took broad look at issues of basin but <br />study did not include sufficient detail for these counties. Most of <br />the population of these counties live on subdivisions plotted <br />before 1972; <br />--Thus, given the number of platted lots, key question is if there <br />are water supply shortages given level of development, water <br />available from natural precipitation? Concern re: areas where <br />lots were plotted out in less than 1 acre. <br />--Objectives: 1) interview counties to determine current and <br />projected populations through 2050; 2) interview water providers <br />(any provider that provides water to four or more homes) re: <br />water demands; 3) identify existing lots (improved or <br />unimproved); 4) evaluate geology to determine amount of <br />aquifer recharge from precept that would be available for long <br />term sustainable water supply (this will involve information <br />available from the USGS study in the Turkey Creek watershed in <br />Jefferson County)(return flows from on-lot sewage disposal <br />systems will be estimated using info from DWR and CO School <br />of Mines)(available ground water level data where available will <br />be used); 5) Identify water demands related to future recreational <br />projects. <br />--Actions will depend on study. <br />--Tasks associated with the objectives are detailed in draft. <br />--Depending on roundtable direction, will move ahead with cost <br />estimates. <br />--Question: 3/lOths of acre foot for a permanent residence with a <br />HIJO well: is this statutory? 35 acres or more have domestic well <br />and use is usually seen to be around 1 acre foot/year. <br />--Simpson: empirical evidence <br />--Dianne Hoppe: Has this study been requested from any west <br />slope basin? <br />--Nicole Rowan: No. <br />--Ralph Topper: Comments: The majority of land in mountains is <br />federally owned; thus, this will have impact in recharge aspect; <br />what about water rights issues? Is the ground water owned by <br />federal government? Suggesting that we should have a component <br />that studies the ownership of the water. <br />--Hal Simpson: Federal Gov. owns tributary rights; federal <br />government does not lay claim to ground water. <br />--Ralf Topper: The ambient water quality in some mountain areas <br />is such that this water would not be available to the water provider <br />and thus the water provider would be looping at alternative <br />sources. <br />6 <br />