Laserfiche WebLink
Interim Guidelines for the <br />Operation of Lake Powell <br />and Lake Mead <br />District of Southern California, Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation <br />District, San Diego County Water Authority, the La Jolla, Pala, Pauma, Rincon and San <br />Pasqual Bands of Mission Indians, the San Luis Rey River Indian Water Authority, the <br />City of Escondido and Vista Irrigation District, dated October 10, 2003. This <br />understanding has also been expressly stated in the proposed Delivery Agreements for <br />IID and MWD (Section V of this ROD). <br />The EPA submitted a comment letter noting it had no objections to the proposed project <br />and some of the details of the Final EIS pertinent to their views. Further, EPA <br />encouraged Reclamation to "play an active role in facilitating comprehensive water <br />management among all water sectors in the Basin." Reclamation intends to continue to <br />pursue its mission in the 17 western states, and in particular on the Colorado River, to <br />assist in meeting the increasing water demands of the West while protecting the <br />environment and the public's investment in these structures. Reclamation places great <br />emphasis on fulfilling its water delivery obligations, water conservation, water <br />recycling and reuse, and developing partnerships with our customers, states, and Native <br />American Tribes, and in finding ways to bring together the variety of interests to <br />address the competing needs for our limited water resources. <br />The Colorado River Board of California submitted comments on behalf of its member <br />agencies on the updated draft Guidelines. The majority of the comments were editorial <br />and to the extent the individual comments improved the clarity of the Guidelines they <br />were incorporated into the Guidelines found in Section XI of this ROD. <br />A comment letter dated November 12, 2007, was received from a single member of the <br />public and noted his concern that the terms of the Biological Opinion (BO) should be <br />met and that impacts due to climate change on "listed fish and birds" are addressed. <br />FWS issued the BO on the Preferred Alternative described in this ROD on December <br />12, 2007. Reclamation has agreed to implement Conservation measures to benefit the <br />listed species addressed in the BO and comply with the terms and conditions of the <br />incidental take statement in the BO. Acknowledging the potential for impacts due to <br />climate change and increased hydrologic variability, the Secretary proposes that the <br />Guidelines be interim in duration and extend through 2026, providing the opportunity to <br />gain valuable operating experience for the management of Lake Powell and Lake Mead, <br />particularly for low reservoir conditions, and improve the basis for making additional <br />future operational decisions, whether during the Interim Period (Section 8 of the <br />Guidelines) or thereafter. In addition, the Preferred Alternative has been crafted to <br />include operational elements that would respond if potential impacts of climate change <br />and increased hydrologic variability are realized. In particular, the Preferred Alternative <br />includes a coordinated operation element that allows for the adjustment of Lake <br />Powell's release to respond to low reservoir storage conditions in Lake Powell or Lake <br />Mead as described in Section 2.7 and Section 2.3 in the Final EIS. In addition, the <br />Preferred Alternative will enhance conservation opportunities in the Lower Basin and <br />the retention of water in Lake Mead through adoption of the ICS mechanism. Finally, <br />the Preferred Alternative includes a shortage strategy at Lake Mead that would result in <br />December 2007 ROD -Colorado River Interim Guidelines for <br />14 Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated <br />Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead <br />