Laserfiche WebLink
Interim Guidelines for the <br />Operation of Lake Powell <br />and Lake Mead <br />statutory framework for administration of Basin entitlements and the significance that a <br />seven-state consensus represents. Multi-state consensus is a rare and unique <br />achievement that should continue to be recognized and facilitated. <br />With respect to the information within the scope of the proposed action, Reclamation <br />concluded that the Preferred Alternative is a reasonable alternative and fully analyzed <br />the environmental effects of this alternative in the Final EIS. The identified <br />environmental effects of the Preferred Alternative are well within the range of <br />anticipated effects of the alternatives presented in the Draft EIS and do not affect the <br />environment in a manner not already considered in the Draft EIS. Thus, based on all <br />available information, this alternative is the most reasonable, feasible, implementable, <br />and durable alternative. <br />Drought is not limited to the Southwest, nor are interstate tensions over water <br />management. As a final basis for this decision, the Department believes that a model <br />for interstate cooperation can be found in the elements of the Preferred Alternative <br />adopted today. <br />VI. Public Response to the Final Environmental Impact <br />Statement <br />Following the Federal Register Notice of Availability of the Final EIS on November 2, <br />2007, and as of 8:00 PM (EST), Tuesday, December 11, 2007, Reclamation received six <br />comment letters on the Final EIS and the updated draft Interim Operational Guidelines <br />for Lake Powell and Lake Mead posted November 16, 2007 on Reclamation's project <br />website. After appropriate consideration, the Department concludes that the comments <br />received do not identify or raise any significant issues that would require supplementing <br />the Final EIS. The major issues noted in the comment letters are summarized below: <br />The Basin States submitted a letter expressing their appreciation to Reclamation and <br />Department staff for their diligence in working with the Basin States and others in <br />developing the draft Guidelines for Lake Powell and Lake Mead; and they further stated <br />that the adoption of the Guidelines "represent a significant and historic milestone, <br />reflecting the continuation of the consultative approach to river management between <br />the federal government and affected states on the Colorado River." <br />The San Diego County Water Authority submitted a comment letter fully supporting the <br />statements in the Basin States' letter to the Secretary on the Final EIS. The Authority <br />also noted their concern that the proposed implementation of Guidelines, specifically <br />ICS, should not inadvertently conflict with the implementation of certain terms of <br />October 10, 2003 Allocation Agreement. The Department agrees that the creation, <br />release, or delivery of ICS or the declaration of an ICS Surplus Condition in a calendar <br />year shall not constitute a determination by the Secretary of the existence of surplus <br />Colorado River water in that calendar year for the purposes of Section 9.2.2 of the <br />Allocation Agreement Among the United States of America, The Metropolitan Water <br />ROD -Colorado River Interim Guidelines for December 2007 <br />Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated 13 <br />Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead <br />