Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Fryingpan-Arkansas Project diverts water out of the Fryingpan River and Hunter Creek <br />drainages, tributaries of the Roaring Fork River, into the Arkansas River Basin. The project <br />contemplated a diversion of about 69,000 af per year. Ruedi Reservoir on the Fryingpan River <br />provides storage for the project and West Slope uses. <br /> <br />In June 1962, Congress approved the Navajo Indian Irrigation Project and the San Juan- <br />Chama Projects as participating projects. 125 The San Juan-Chama Project was designed to divert <br />about 110,000 af per year from the headwaters of the San Juan River into the Rio Grande River <br />Basin in New Mexico. The Navajo Indian Irrigation Project will ultimately irrigate 110,000 acres <br />of lands on the Navajo Reservation in northwest New Mexico. <br /> <br />By 1968 projects were in place or under construction to provide Colorado River water <br />virtually to every major municipal area in the river basins that rim the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br />Albuquerque, Santa Fe, Pueblo, Colorado Springs, Aurora, Denver, Boulder, Fort Collins, Cheyenne <br />and Utah's Wasatch Front communities all receive a portion of their municipal water from the <br />Colorado River System. <br /> <br />As authorized by the CRSP A, Navajo Dam was completed in 1963, Flaming Gorge Dam in <br />1964, Glen Canyon Dam in 1964 and Blue Mesa Dam in 1966. By late 1967, Navajo Reservoir, Blue <br />Mesa Reservoir and Flaming Gorge Reservoir had all filled and Lake Powell was filling under <br />special filling criteria approved by the Secretary of the Interior. <br /> <br />Reclamation had also completed a number of smaller participating irrigation projects <br />including the Silt, Paonia, Colbran, Florida, Smith Fork and Bostwick Park Projects in Colorado, and <br />similar projects in Utah and Wyoming. <br /> <br />Colorado River Basin Project Act <br /> <br />The Supreme Court's 1963 decision and 1964 decree in Arizona v. California moved the <br />debate over the CAP back to Congress. <br /> <br />The 89th Congress was convened on January 3, 1964 and on January 6, 1964 Arizona's two <br />Senators, Carl Hayden and Paul Fannin introduced legislation (S- 7 5) to authorize the CAP. At the <br />same time California Senators Thomas Kuchel and Frank Murphy introduced their own legislation <br />(S-294). A California Congressman, Craig Hosmer, introduced legislation similar to S-294 in <br />House. 126 Obviously, the Californians had a different future in mind for the CAP than the Arizonans. <br /> <br />By this time, it was already well accepted that there was even less water in the Colorado <br />River than believed in 1953 when the litigation had started. In July 1965, Royce Tipton prepared a <br /> <br />125 76 Stat. 96. (1962). <br /> <br />126 Johnson, page 149. <br /> <br />Page -43- <br />