My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00152
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00152
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:19:47 AM
Creation date
1/18/2008 12:46:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2007
Title
Chatfield, Cherry Creek, and Bear Creek Colorado Reallocation Feasibility Study
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
US Army Coprs of Engineers
Description
Chatfield, Cherry Creek, and Bear Creek Colorado Reallocation Feasibility Study
Publications - Doc Type
Tech Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />4. WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE. <br />4.1. GENERAL <br />The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is a breakdown of the project into its component <br />. work tasks and products. The detailed WBS for this project is provided in the Appendix <br />A. . <br /> <br />4.2. IN-KIND SERVICES <br />The Sponsor may contribute up to 50 percent of the Study Costs through the provision of <br />In-Kind Services (IKS),subject to applicable laws and as negotiated as part of the cost <br />share agreement. The IKS work will be geared to services that City officials can provide <br />more efficiently and which improve the accuracy of the feasibility study. The IKS to be <br />provided by the Sponsor, the estimated negotiated costs for those services and the <br />estimated schedule under which those services are to be provided are specified in the <br />PMP established for the Cost-Shared Feasibility phase. Negotiated costs shall be subject <br />to an audit by the Government to determine reasonableness and allowability. The local <br />Sponsor shall provide documentation of the method by which the In-Kind Services were <br />computed; The WBS details the tasks that are anticipated to be credited as In-Kind <br />Services. <br /> <br />5. FUNDING. ***Currently Under Revision <br />The GI study is funded on a 50% cost share basis between the local sponsor and the Federal <br />Government. The original study costs in the 1998 Project Study Plan were $1,984,684. <br />Since then the study costs have increased to approximately $4 million. The revised <br />Appendix A reflects the most current estimate. Due to Federal funding limitations the <br />sponsor has agreed to reduce in kind credits to be able to contribute more cash to the study. <br />The in kind amount has been reduced from approximately $600K to $400K. The CWCB's <br />share of funding has been supported by 15 local water user groups. <br /> <br /> <br /> Total Est. Federal Total Sponsor Sponsor <br /> Allocation Sponsor Cash In-kind <br />A. Costs thru FY06 $2,720,000 $1,573,000 $1,147,000 $1,147,000 <br />B. Est. FY07-FY08 <br />Remaining Tasks <br />Tetra Tech Contract $365,000 $150,000 $215,000 $205,000 <br />Remaining Hydrology $17,000 $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 <br />Work <br />Remaining Hydraulic $11,000 $8,500 $2,500 $2,500 <br />Work <br />Environ/Economic $109,000 $60,000 $49,000 $0 <br />Review <br />Project Management $150,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 <br />Program Management $11,000 $5,000 $6,000 $6,000 <br />USFWS Coordination $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.