My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00152
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00152
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:19:47 AM
Creation date
1/18/2008 12:46:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2007
Title
Chatfield, Cherry Creek, and Bear Creek Colorado Reallocation Feasibility Study
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
US Army Coprs of Engineers
Description
Chatfield, Cherry Creek, and Bear Creek Colorado Reallocation Feasibility Study
Publications - Doc Type
Tech Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />The simplest, least costly method that would give an approximation of ecosystem units <br />would be to use existing HEC-RAS modeling efforts. Stream cross-sections and HEC- <br />RAS modeling developed either by the Corps for flood damage reduction studies or by <br />the In-stream Issues GrouplUDFCD (see pages 33 and 37 of South Platte River Corridor <br />Project, In-stream Issues Report, November 14, 1996) would be used. The HEC-RAS <br />modeling would enable a calculation of channel top width surface area for any given <br />flow, which is a quantification of stream habitat. <br /> <br />For a more detailed and accurate approach, and also because of the age of the cross <br />sections, stream geometry data would be collected at low flow by means of digital <br />topographic surveys, and then entered into a geo-referenced HEC-GeoRAS model and <br />ArcGIS extension. This method would then translate the information into a depth grid of <br />inundated area. <br /> <br />For either method, an ecosystem function model (HEC-EFM) would be used that would <br />input flow and stage time series and eco-hydro relationships data. An example of eco- <br />hydro relationships data would be wintertime target flows of 60 to 85 cfs. Relationships <br />regarding summertime target flows should also be developed by a fish and wildlife <br />stakeholder workgroup. <br /> <br />For the more detailed approach, relationships regarding depths and ecosystem indicator <br />species should also be developed. The more detailed and accurate modeling effort would <br />be used to visualize existing ecologic conditions, highlight promising restoration sites, <br />and assess and rank alternatives according to the relative enhancement (or decline) of <br />ecosystem aspects. <br /> <br />Either approach will also involve outputs in quality. Quality indexes will need to be <br />developed that relates existing and forecasted in-stream flows and stream bank conditions <br />to the stream habitat/riparian habitat river ecosystem quality. The eco-hydro <br />relationships would be used in the development of the quality index. A GIS vegetation <br />survey completed in 1996-1998 by the Denver Audubon Society would also be used. <br />The resulting assessment will likely result in acres of a habitat type multiplied by a <br />quality index ranging from 0.25 (poor) to 1.00 (excellent) in order to obtain habitat or <br />ecosystem units. <br /> <br /> <br />The inventory and forecast will address fish and wildlife, Federal and State-listed <br />threatened and endangered species, other species of special concern, and migratory birds <br />recognizing 17 species of fish-eating birds. Information from the 1996 South Platte <br />River Corridor Project In-stream Issues Report, and other readily available information <br />will be researched, extracted, and consolidated for this step of planning. No plant or <br />animal surveys will be required. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.