Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />mitigation, habitat restoration, wate~ quality, and environmental impact <br />analysis. It is also expected that thd reviewer will be able to provide <br />I <br />comment as well as suggest directio,n regarding te'ihnical, legal, and policy <br />issues that may come up in the: subject of environmental planning and <br />analysis. <br />6) Economics ~ The revieWer should have a firm grasp ofthe interrelated <br />aspects of water reallocation econoiliics, financial, planning and plan <br />formulation, as well as flood damag~ reduction analysis. The reviewer will <br />also need to consider closely certain aspects of the analysis such as water <br />demand and water conservation, as irell as cost analysis for reallocated <br />storage in order to maintain consistency with current policy and guidance. <br />7) Dam Safety - The reviewer should be an expert in dam safety, with <br />specific regard to hydrologic applications to dam safety issues. The <br />reviewer will need to be able to comment on geotechnical and structural <br />analysis that supports findings in the Feasibility Study. While the Dam <br />Safety will not be highly rigorous, this is an important part of the ITR due <br />to the potential implications of Dam Safety with regard to a reallocation <br />project in an area where dam safety has a high level of scrutiny right now. <br /> <br />I. EPR Selection <br /> <br />An External Peer Review is not anticipated for this study. <br /> <br />J. Public Peer Review <br /> <br />While no formal Public Peer Review is included in the current schedule and <br />budget, it is likely that as the study generates alternative plans that there may be <br />interest from Universities along the Front Range in Colorado. Their input and <br />comment will be welcome at the Public Involvement meeting and through individual <br />contacts in specific subject matter areas. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />