My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00148
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00148
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:18:42 AM
Creation date
1/18/2008 12:38:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1978
Title
The Colorado Water Study Directions for the Future
CWCB Section
Administration
Description
The Colorado Water Study Directions for the Future
Publications - Doc Type
Historical
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
793
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2. Encouragement and Control of Large-scale <br />Irrigation Projects. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The next several decades witnessed a sharp increase in the numbE:r <br />of large-scale water projects and corresponding adjustments in the <br />system of adjudicating and administering water rights. Experience <br />with the actual operation of the Colorado system led the legislature <br />to make some necessary revisions in the statutory framework, but the <br />basic structure remained unchanged. Irrigation was by far the major <br />consumptive water use in the state and the law followed its develop- <br />ment, although other uses gradually came to be recognized. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />a. Financing and Management. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I ,: <br /> <br />In 1909, or thereabouts, the annual increase in the number of <br />irrigated acres began to decline.138 This trend was no doubt aggra- <br />vated by the agricultural depression in the 1920s. A large factor, <br />however, was the growing difficulty of bringing the water to the land. <br />The river valleys and lowlands were, naturally enough, the targets <br />of the first irrigation projects; however, these opportunities were <br />in due course exhausted, forcing new development onto the fertile <br />but arid bench lands. These projects required greater cap:ital outlay <br />than their predecessors, and new institutions evolved to make their <br />construction possible.139 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />(1) Ditch Companies. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Private investment was channeled through large ditch corporations <br />set up to construct canals and ditches and sell the water to the <br />farmers. The traditional legislative concern with these companies <br />was evidenced in a number of acts supplementing the constitutionallll.O <br />regulation of rates by the county commissioners. Statutes of 1887 <br />and 1893141 required all persons owning or controlling any canal or <br />ditch used for irrigation purposes to keep enough water in the ditch <br />during farming season to supply all persons entitled to its use, <br />within the limits of the ditch priority. Another act outlawed <br />extortion and under-the-table bargains in the sale of water.142 <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(2) Irrigation Districts. <br /> <br />Ii <br /> <br />Another means of financing large projects was launched in 1901 <br />with the first statute authorizing the formation of irrigation <br />districts.143 These organizations, as reconstituted by later <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1I-2l <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.