Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />as may tend to show compliance with the law.,,132 The appointment <br />of a referee to take testimony was left to the discretion of the <br />court. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />All owners of existing ditches and reservoirs were required to <br />file a statement of their claim to priority with the court, which <br />entitled them to notice of the proceedings and the right to present <br />evidence in support of their claim. In addition, important progress <br />was 'made in ascertaining future priorities by requiring each new ditch <br />or reservoir owner to file with the county clerk a map and statement <br />describing the construction of his facility. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Office of the State Engineer was created, with authority to <br />supervise the water companies and to measure the capacities of all <br />the streams, ditches, and reservoirs in the state. The state engineer <br />was also to supervise the construction and maintenance of measuring <br />devices which were required on every ditch and reservoir. However, <br />a provision requiring the state engineer to submit information con- <br />cerning the capacities of all the ditches in the district to the <br />court prior to its determination of priorities was deleted from the <br />final bill.133 There is evidence134 that in creating the Office of <br />the State Engineer, the legislature was greatly influenced by the <br />experience in California, where a similar office had been created <br />three years earlier.135 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Another innovation was the creation of water divisions encom- <br />passing an entire watershed. This had been suggested in the Denver <br />convention in 1878, but was not acted upon in the following year. <br />While the 1881 act did create three such divisions, for the South <br />Platte, Arkansas, and Rio Grande basins, respectively, they did not <br />become operational until 1887 when each existing division was provided <br />with a superintendent of irrigation.136 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The farmers had found that the damages caused by the construction <br />of rights-of-way were greater than expected. Consequently, the 1881 <br />legislation put some controls on the exercise of the constitutional <br />right of access by prohibiting more than one ditch to be built <br />across anyone's land without his consent and requiring that the short- <br />est possible route be chosen. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The first adjudication decree awarded under the Colorado system <br />was, appropriately enough, in Water District No.3 on the Poudre <br />River. Judge Elliot appointed Henry P. H. Bromwell, a principal <br />architect of the system, as referee. Bromwell filed his report on <br />March 20, 1882, and the decree was issued on April 11.137 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1I-20 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />