My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
27 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
27 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:37:59 PM
Creation date
1/18/2008 10:32:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/23/2008
Description
Director's Report - CWCB Director
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A bill for the Fry-Ark Project enlargements is still possible, but is not ready at this point. <br />FRY-ARK MANAGER READY TO STEP DOWN: Tom Musgrove, the Bureau of <br />Reclamation's facilities manager for the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, is retiring this month. The <br />Southeastern Colorado Water Consen~ation District board honored Musgrove with a resolution <br />recognizing his years of service to the project. <br />Musgrove's successor will be Roy `'aughn, who has spent the past two years training for the task. <br />FARM EFFICIENCY RULES DRAFTED: New rules that would limit agricultural diversions <br />under improvements made after 1999 are being proposed by the Colorado Division of Water Resources. <br />The rules are aimed at preventing water shortages in deliveries of the Arkansas River to Kansas under the <br />1949 Arkansas River Compact. The state is close to settling a 21-year fight in the U.S. Supreme Court <br />over the river, but has concerns that agricultural practices such as sprinklers, drip irrigation and canal <br />lining could lead to a new round of fights. <br />Draft rules are now available from the Division 2 office and public meetings to discuss the rules will <br />begin in January. <br />Efficiency in agriculture could reduce labor costs and could have water quality benefits, but the state is <br />most concerned about the reduction of return flows. <br />The rules would apply only to physical changes in water systems, not other methods like altered cropping <br />patterns, irrigation scheduling, cultivation or maintenance. The rules would not apply to wells, which are <br />already regulated by rules to augment flows in the river. The rules also would only apply to the Arkansas <br />River basin. <br />While furrow irrigation uses about 50 percent of the water applied to land, sprinklers are 75 percent <br />efficient and drip systems close to 100 percent. As that efficiency increases, the amount of water that runs <br />back to the river is less, leaving less water for downstream users, whether they are in Colorado or Kansas, <br />Witte said. <br />The rules would go back to 1999, because a thorough assessment of irrigation patterns was made then in <br />relation to the Supreme Court case. <br />WATER BOARD OKs PACT WITH AURORA: An agreement that formalizes the operation of <br />the Busk-Ivanhoe system has been reached between the Pueblo Board of Water Works and Aurora. <br />Pueblo purchased half of the Busk-Ivanhoe system from the High Line Canal in 1971, while Aurora <br />bought most of the remaining shares in 1988. The system collects water from three ditches, bringing it <br />into Ivanhoe Lake, located at 11,500 feet elevation on the Western Slope. <br />The system provides an average of more than 5,000 acre-feet annually (roughly 2,500 acre-feet to each <br />partner) and costs about $130,000 to operate, mostly to pay caretakers who live at Ivanhoe Lake from <br />April to October to maintain the system. Another $1 million in improvements are planned in the next <br />three years to improve living quarters, make some dam repairs and build a shop. <br />~12~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.