Laserfiche WebLink
will be used to rank the projects from highest to lowest, factors in flood control, ecosystem restoration, <br />and channel stability benefits. Based on this ranking, and discussion by the TAC during the November <br />meeting, the identified projects to move forward with study on are: <br />• Pueblo Levee <br />• Highway 24 Corridor <br />• Cheyenne Creek <br />• Jimmy Camp Creek Confluence <br />• Clear Springs Ranch Vicinity <br />• Fountain Valley Park Vicinity <br />• Lower Fountain Creek Reach near Pinon <br />• Fountain Creek Monument Confluence to City Limits <br />• Dam Above Pueblo <br />• Lower Fountain Creek Pinon to Pueblo Reach <br />• Lower Fountain Creek in Pueblo From Hwy 47 to 4th Street <br />• Fountain Creek -Fountain Valley Park to Clear Springs Ranch <br />For each "project", the area or subject identified will be studied in detail to determine what physical or <br />policy actions need to take place to assist in meeting the target goals of flood reduction, ecosystem <br />restoration, and increases to channel stability. Meeting the established schedule timelines was contingent <br />upon receiving $147,000 in funding from Congress. This successful funding was announced on <br />December 19, 2007. The schedule calls for projects to be completed by the end of March 2008 with a <br />draft report of the findings by June 2008. <br />SALAZAR INTRODUCES FOUNTAIN CREEK DAM STUDY BILL: U.S. Sen. Ken Salazar, <br />D-Colo, on November 17, 2007 introduced a bill to authorize a study of the feasibility of a dam on <br />Fountain Creek. <br />The bill calls for the Army Corps of Engineers to study one or more multipurpose dams on Fountain <br />Creek within two years of enactment of the legislation. The proposed legislation spells out that a dam, or <br />dams, would be used for flood control, sediment control, water supply, water quality and wildlife habitat. <br />It also directs the Corps to incorporate a 1970 study of Fountain Creek and the ongoing Fountain Creek <br />Watershed Plan in the new study. <br />It would not impact any other studies relating to Fountain Creek, the Ftyingpan-Arkansas Project or the <br />Southern Delivery System. <br />Salazar has been meeting with water officials on water storage issues in the Arkansas Basin for the past <br />year and his staff has been active in the Fountain Creek Vision Task Force since its formation in 2006. <br />At a June meeting with groups that had been negotiating over the Southeastern Colorado Water <br />Conser~~ancy District's Preferred Storage Options Plan, Salazar floated a bill that would have combined a <br />feasibility study of enlarging Lake Pueblo, Turquoise Lake and a possible dam on Fountain Creek. <br />Some of the negotiators at an October meeting said the Fountain Creek proposal unnecessarily <br />complicated the Arkansas River storage projects bill, and Salazar indicated at the time he might split the <br />two ideas. Enlargement of Lake Pueblo and Turquoise Lake would involve the Bureau of Reclamation, <br />rather than the Corps, since they are both part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project. <br />~11~ <br />