My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Section5_Gap_11-7-07
CWCB
>
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
Section5_Gap_11-7-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:29:57 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 2:08:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
Title
SWSI Phase 2 Report - Section 5 Addressing the Water Supply Gap Technical Roundtable
Date
11/7/2007
Author
CWCB
SWSI II - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 5 <br />Addressing the Water Supply Gap Technical Roundtable <br />It is unknown if a Blue River pumpback project <br />were to be developed if any yield would be made <br />available to the South Metro water providers or <br />other gap areas or users in the South Platte Basin. <br />The cost of payments to Denver Water for the use of <br />Dillon Reservoir and the Roberts Tunnel would <br />need to be negotiated. <br />Project Elements <br />~ Pump from Green Mountain Reservoir to Dillon <br />Reservoir. <br />~ Replace Green Mountain Reservoir functions <br />with other Colorado Basin storage. <br />~ Additional Storage in Arkansas and South Platte <br />Basins. <br />As with any new west slope consumptive use, the <br />issue of supply availability and other considerations <br />would be required before a determination could be <br />made on available yield for this project. There are <br />issues associated with compact administration, <br />permitting, technical, political, and other issues. <br />Concerns have been raised by certain water users in <br />Colorado regarding supply availability, potential <br />impacts on existing Colorado water rights and <br />administration of any new depletive Colorado River <br />water right. In addition, west slope entities have <br />stressed that "as a practical matter, that because a <br />Blue River Pumpback relies on use of storage in <br />Green Mountain Reservoir, the viability of a <br />pumpback is contingent on the consent and <br />cooperation of the West Slope. Accordingly, it first <br />must satisfy West Slope needs without causing <br />unacceptable impacts. If a Blue River pumpback <br />passes that threshold test, then the question <br />becomes whether it can be a viable supply for the <br />East Slope." (Preface to Executive Summary by <br />Colorado River Water Conservation District, <br />September 19, 2007) <br />The following are some of the key considerations <br />when examining the project elements, benefits, <br />potential implementation issues and potential <br />attributes for this alternative. <br />~ Conjunctive use with non-tributary <br />groundwater. <br />~ Payment to Denver for use of system. <br />Benefits: <br />~ Minimize loss of irrigated acres in South Platte <br />and Arkansas Basins. <br />~ Maximize Colorado's Colorado River compact <br />entitlement. <br />~ Additional flows in Upper South Platte. <br />~ Grand County streamflow management. <br />~ Additional Grand Valley water supplies. <br />~ Dillon Reservoir levels. <br />~ Additional water supplies for the upper Blue <br />River. <br />~ Additional yield for Clinton Reservoir. <br />~ Blue River flow enhancement. <br />~ Additional west slope supplies. <br />~ Abandonment of some Eagle River rights. <br />FINAL DRAFT 5-39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.