Laserfiche WebLink
Section 7 <br />Availability of Existing Water Supplies <br />approximately 300,000 AF total storage, beyond which <br />no significant gains in firm yield can be achieved with <br />increased storage. At the asymptotic value, all excess <br />water is captured, stored, and used, but supply is still <br />limited (below the average annual) by the timing of the <br />available flows and reservoir evaporation and seepage. <br />The critical (limiting) period for this analysis is the late <br />1970s. Note that yields would likely be significantly <br />higher if some value or frequency of shortages, greater <br />than zero, were acceptable. <br />Potential limitations to the projected supply availability as <br />a result of the Colorado River Compact are evaluated in <br />Section 7.4. The Compact includes potential limitations <br />for the Colorado, Gunnison, Dolores/San Juan/San <br />Miguel, and Yampa Basins combined as well as <br />additional limitations on certain subbasins. <br />The future development of existing conditional water <br />rights, including the Animas-La Plata Project, are not <br />included in the Colorado DSS datasets. These water <br />rights could eventually be developed resulting in less <br />available water for the rest of the basin. Development of <br />conditional rights, however, must be applied to beneficial <br />use and meet a water need. Conditional water rights by <br />basin are summarized in Section 10. Since the current <br />Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel DSS dataset covers the <br />period from 1909 to 1999, once the current drought has <br />ended, the DSS dataset for the basin should be <br />extended, including updated irrigated acres and M&I <br />demands. A new StateMod model run should be <br />conducted with the updated dataset to determine if the <br />recent drought is a new critical period. <br />~~ <br />Maintaining or enhancing recreational and environmental <br />flows could affect current and future supply availability. <br />Environmental and recreational considerations are <br />further developed in Sections 6 and 10 of this report. For <br />example, a number of endangered fish species, such as <br />the Razorback Sucker and the Pikeminnow, are present <br />in the Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel Basin, and require <br />special attention with respect to minimum instream flows. <br />Reoperation of Navajo Reservoir, stocking, and habitat <br />improvement are options that can help meet the needs of <br />endangered species in this basin. <br />Finally, discussions with basin stakeholders have noted <br />that the impacts of CBM water extractions on supply <br />availability, particularly in the Pine and Florida River <br />systems, are unknown and are not included in the <br />StateMod dataset. <br />There are minor transbasin diversions from the Dolores/ <br />San Juan/San Miguel to the Rio Grande Basin averaging <br />1,873 AF from 1971 to 2003 (Upper Colorado River <br />Commission 2004). <br />7.3.3.2 Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel <br />Alluvial Aquifers <br />No significant alluvial aquifers have been identified. <br />There are domestic wells in the basin that are recharged <br />by agricultural return flows and the long-term viability of <br />these wells is dependent upon the continued pattern of <br />irrigation return flows. <br />~~ <br />Statew~itle Water Supply Inii'iative <br />7-34 S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\S7 11-10.04.DOC <br />