My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
S7_11-15-04
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
S7_11-15-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2010 9:24:17 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 11:11:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Statewide
Title
SWSI Phase 1 Report - Section 7 Availability of Existing Water Supplies
Date
11/15/2004
Author
CWCB
SWSI - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 7 <br />Availability of Existing Water Supplies <br />7.3.3 Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel <br />Basin <br />7.3.3.1 Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel Surface <br />Water Supplies <br />The Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel basin StateMod <br />dataset incorporates the La Plata Compact, an interstate <br />compact that governs the distribution of water on the La <br />Plata River between Colorado and New Mexico. <br />Administration of the compact is dependent on the <br />stream flow at two USGS gaging stations: Hesperus <br />Station and Interstate Station. Colorado's allocation of <br />water per the Compact becomes limited if flow at <br />Interstate Station falls below 100 cfs between <br />February 16 and November 30, with the required <br />downstream delivery on the following day equal to one- <br />half of the mean flow at Hesperus. The DSS simulates <br />compact restrictions according to these rules. <br />Ten locations were selected for the Dolores/San Juan/ <br />San Miguel basin to characterize supply availability using <br />StateMod datasets. The period of record for the <br />Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel StateMod datasets is 1909 <br />to 1999 (full calendar years). <br />The selected locations, shown in Figure 7-34 are: <br />rivers that do not flow into New Mexico. For some of the <br />locations, however, such as the Dolores River near <br />Dolores, downstream priority calls are minimal. <br />Figure 7-36 shows minimum, median, and maximum <br />annual legally available flows for the period of record. A <br />wide range of annual flows at the locations indicates that <br />firm yield supply may be significantly less than average <br />yield supply. <br />To better represent the effects of seasonal and year to <br />year hydrologic variation, monthly (for minimum, <br />maximum, and median years) and annual time series of <br />legally available flows for the periods of record are <br />shown in Figures 7-37 through 7-56. The median annual <br />flow and 3-year running averages are also included on <br />the annual time series plots. The monthly analyses <br />highlight the fact that available flows vary greatly with <br />season, with the greatest amounts of water available in <br />the summer months and a sharp decline in flows in the <br />autumn and winter. The annual time series plots also <br />show large variation. For most of the locations, a notable <br />extended drought period is evident from the late 1980s to <br />the early 1990s, with more acute droughts in the <br />mid-1930s, 1950s, and Iate1970s. Extended wet periods <br />evident in these figures include the early 1940s and the <br />mid-1980s. <br />^ San Juan River at Navajo <br />^ Piedra River at Arboles <br />^ Los Pinos River at Boca <br />^ Animas River at the state line <br />^ La Plata River at the state line <br />^ Mancos River at Towaoc <br />^ Dolores River near polores <br />^ Dolores River near Bedrock <br />^ San Miguel River near Placerville <br />^ San Miguel River near Uraven <br />Median annual legally available, physically available, and <br />naturalized flows are summarized for each location in <br />Figure 7-35. Differences between legally and physically <br />available flows indicate that much of the physically <br />available flow at upstream locations may not be available <br />for development due to senior downstream water rights <br />With respect to the San Juan River and its tributaries, it <br />should be noted that approximately 85 percent of the <br />San Juan's flow originates in Colorado, and yet Colorado <br />must assure that adequate water passes the state line <br />for use in New Mexico. Consistent with the Colorado <br />River Compact, New Mexico's allocation under the <br />Compact cannot be satisfied by other Colorado compact <br />~ <br />$~ole'ri~ice Wo~e' $upplY Initia~ive <br />The interpretation above is in general agreement with the <br />CWCB Drought Study (HDR 2003), which summarized <br />the history of drought in Colorado and identified <br />significant drought periods in the last 100 years. The <br />Drought Study states that the most recent drought <br />analyzed for years 2000 to 2003 exceeds many of the <br />drought records established during the 20th century. It <br />should be noted that the drought period of the past few <br />years, which may not yet be over, is not yet included in <br />the StateMod datasets, and therefore, not represented in <br />the available flow numbers presented here. <br />Finally, Figure 7-57 is provided to further quantify the <br />impacts of seasonal and year to year hydrologic variation <br />and to illustrate the difference between average annual <br />available flow and the potential annual firm yield. This <br />chart shows firm yield as a function of total available <br />storage for legally available flows at the San Miguel River <br />near Placerville. For the San Miguel River near <br />Placerville, even with very large volumes of storage, the <br />maximum annual firm yield is only approximately 77 <br />percent of the average annual available flow. The curve <br />reaches an asymptotic value of 125,000 AFY at <br />~~ ~ <br />S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\S7 11-10.04.DOC 7-33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.