Laserfiche WebLink
Section 6 <br />Water Needs Assessment <br />1995), which incidentally contradict the flow <br />recommendations developed for the state line. <br />work and consider using this more data-intensive <br />methodology for future flow recommendations. <br />Flow recommendations for the 15-mile reach are <br />summarized in Table 6-11 on a mean monthly discharge <br />basis. These recommendations are for the "top of the <br />15-mile reach." These recommendations take into <br />account and are for a point immediately below the <br />Orchard Mesa Power Plant return and Grand Valley <br />Irrigation Company diversion (USFWS 1995). <br />Recommendations are provided for years of high, above- <br />average, below-average, and low runoff. <br />The flow recommendations are data specific to the <br />15-mile reach and relate to adult Colorado pikeminnow <br />habitat preferences, general relationships between stage <br />and habitat quantity and quality, and discharge <br />thresholds for sediment transport. As additional studies <br />are completed, knowledge of the relationship between <br />discharge and fish habitat will continue to evolve and <br />recommendations will continue to be refined. <br />The CDOW, at the request of CWCB, is conducting <br />research to provide detailed information on the <br />relationship between discharge, habitat availability, and <br />fish population. The CDOW intensively studied several <br />sites on the Yampa and Colorado Rivers to obtain very <br />specific data about the habitat type and quantity and fish <br />abundance and biomass found at various discharges. <br />This more detailed analysis will help decisionmakers <br />maximize the benefits of available water during any <br />particular hydrologic condition. The CWCB and CDOW <br />have requested that the Recovery Program review this <br />The flow rate is the percent of years that the <br />recommended flows should be provided based on winter <br />snow pack levels. For example, in the wettest 25 percent <br />of years, flows in June should average at least <br />15,660 cfs; stated another way, this recommendation <br />should be met in 5 of every 20 years. During low-water <br />years, June flows should average no less than 6,850 cfs, <br />and such a minimum should occur at a rate of no more <br />than 4 in 20 years (20 percent). <br />Numerous instream flow rights have been decreed on <br />major rivers and tributaries in the Colorado River Basin <br />(http://cwcb.state.co.us/isf/Downloads/Index.htm). Some <br />of the decreed rights on major rivers are listed in <br />Table 6-12. These rights are year-round rights containing <br />seasonable variability as reflected in the range of values <br />as shown. Flow rights on smaller tributaries in the basin <br />can be found at the above reference. <br />Instream flows are maintained as requirements or targets <br />below several BOR projects in the Colorado Basin. A <br />description of these flows is provided in Table 6-13. <br />6.3.2.2.2 Water-Based Recreation <br />Numerous river reaches in Colorado are used for <br />whitewater rafting. Table 6-14 shows the reaches in the <br />Colorado basin that are listed for rafting use by American <br />Whitewater. <br />Table 6-11 Recommended Mean Monthly Flows for the Top of the 15-Mile Reach in cfs (Osmundson 1995) <br /> <br />25% :.. <br />25% :m <br />1,630 1,630 <br />1,630 s$ <br />3,210 <br />10,720 <br />15,660 <br />7,060 . <br />1,630 :. <br />1,630 ~ <br />1,630 0 <br />1,630 r- <br />1,630 <br />25% 50% 1,630 1,630 1,630 2,440 9,380 14,250 5,370 1,630 1,630 1,630 1,630 1,630 <br />30% 80% 1,630 1,630 1,630 2,260 7,710 11,350 3,150 1,240 1,240 1,240 1,630 1,630 <br />20% 100% 1,240 1,240 1,240 1,860 7,260 6,850 1,480 810 810 810 1,240 1,240 <br />r~ <br />S:\REPORIIWORD PROCESSING\REPORllS6 11-8-04.DOC 6-37 <br />