My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
S6_11-15-04
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
S6_11-15-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2010 9:24:17 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 11:00:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Statewide
Title
SWSI Phase 1 Report - Section 6 Water Needs Assessment
Date
11/15/2004
Author
CWCB
SWSI - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 6 <br />Water Needs Assessment <br />Table 6-4 Detailed Identified Projects and Processes forthe Arkansas Basin <br />. <br />.. <br />'. .~ <br /> <br />~r. <br />~ <br />Teller Cripple Creek 0 N Just received a new water right Sandy MacDougall, MacDougall, <br /> decree. Should be adequate based Woldridge and Worley <br /> on recent growth rates continuing into <br /> the future, but is evaluating future <br /> needs. Penrose Water District, <br /> Beaver Park Irrigation Company, <br /> CDOW, Victor and Cripple Creek <br /> cooperated on meeting 2002 drought <br /> needs. Could use more high altitude <br /> stora e for drou ht reliabili . <br /> Victor 600 N Town is supplying all of the water it Sandy MacDougall, MacDougall, <br /> can product to the gold mine. The Woldridge and Worley <br /> gold mine has a current shortage of <br /> 600 to 1,200 AF per year. Long-term <br /> status of gold mining is uncertain. If <br /> gold mining ceases, Victor has an <br /> excess of supply. CWCB assisted in <br /> funding a dam rehab. Colorado <br /> Springs upstream collection system <br /> limits physical supply. Physical <br /> availabiliiy a concern in 2002 and <br /> Colorado Springs cooperated in <br /> bypass of water. Penrose Water <br /> District, Beaver Park Irrigation <br /> Company, CDOW, Victor and Cripple <br /> Creek cooperated on meeting 2002 <br /> drought needs. Could use more high <br /> altitude storage for drought reliabiliiy. <br />* Y= Yes; N= No; U= Unknown <br />A summary of the gaps for each subbasin are shown on <br />Table 6-5. The greatest gap is in northern EI Paso <br />County, where renewable sources of water are needed <br />to replace the current 100 percent reliance on non- <br />tributary groundwater. <br />Table 6-5 Summary of Gap Analysis for Arkansas Basin <br />.. . <br />e • <br />Upper Arkansas 6,600 <br />Chaffee, Fremont, Lake, Teller <br />Urban Counties 8,000 <br />EI Paso, Pueblo <br />Lower Arkansas 800 <br />Bent, Crowle , Otero, Prowers <br />Eastern Plains 1,200 <br />(Baca, Cheyenne, Elbert, Kiowa, <br />Lincoln <br />Southwestern Arkansas 500 <br />Custer, Huerfano, Las Animas <br />TOTAL 17,100 <br />6.3.1.2 Recreational and Environmental <br />Information <br />6.3.1.2.1 Flow Considerations <br />There are no CWCB decreed instream flow rights on the <br />mainstem of the Arkansas River. Flow rights on <br />tributaries in the basin can be found at <br />http://cwcb. state. co. us/isf/Down loads/I ndex. htm. <br />Above Pueblo Reservoir, the following flow <br />considerations are of note: <br />Fryinppan-Arkansas Proiect <br />Via the Fry-Ark Project's operating plan, a minimum flow <br />of 66.0 cfs was established for the Arkansas River at <br />Granite, which is the only legal minimum flow <br />requirement on the mainstem of the Arkansas (Smith and <br />Hill 2000). <br />t~ <br />6-22 S:\REPORIIWORD PROCESSING\REPORllS6 11-8-04.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.