Laserfiche WebLink
Section 6 <br />Water Needs Assessment <br />Table 6-2 Statewid e M&I and SSI Ga s in 2030 <br /> <br />- <br />. -. <br /> . <br />-.. <br />.- -. . <br /> <br />.. ~ <br /> •.- . .- -. <br /> • . • . - <br /> <br />. <br />.- -. . <br />•. <br /> ,° • f i R .0 <br />Arkansas 98,000 80,900 17,100 Upper and Southwestern regions (augmentation credits) and <br /> Lower region and unincorporated EI Paso Couniy (firm water <br /> su I . <br />Colorado 61,900 58,900 3,000 Garfield, Grand and Summit Counties <br />Dolores/San 18,800 13,900 4,900 San Miguel (water supply), Dolores (need for augmentation <br />Juan/San Miguel credits) and San Juan (infrastructure to deliver existing and future <br /> water su lies . <br />Gunnison 14,900 12,500 2,400 Crested Butte Mountain Resort, Upper Gunnison and Ouray <br /> County (need for augmentation credits) and other unincorporated <br /> areas not served b Water Districts. <br />North Platte 100 100 0 No a antici ated, but stora e re uired for drou ht reliabili <br />Rio Grande 4,300 4,200 100 Physical availability of groundwater, but will need augmentation <br /> credits for well um in . <br />South Platte 409,700 319,100 90,600 South and Denver Metro, Northern, Upper Mountains and Lower <br /> Platte. <br />Yampa/VVhite/ 22,300 22,300 0 Concerns over drought reliabiliiy due to transit losses. Oil shale <br />Green development in White River basin could significantly increase <br /> demands. <br />Total 630,000 511,800 118,200 <br />Figure 6-4 presents this information on a map of the description of the major ldentified Projects and <br />state. In many cases, the Identified Projects and Processes in each basin. Due to the number of counties <br />Processes have benefits for multiple users, such as and distinct areas in the Arkansas, Dolores/San Juan/ <br />agriculture, recreation, and environmental needs. San Miguel, and South Platte Basins, those basins are <br /> summarized by subbasins, whereas each of the other <br />A broad range of water management solutions with basins is discussed at a county level. Because of the <br />varying levels of supply are planned for each of the overall volume of demand and the size of the projected <br />basins. Many water providers are pursuing multiple gaps in the South Platte and Arkansas Basins, those <br />projects and will need all of these identified projects to basins' Identified Projects and Processes lists are more <br />meet their increased demand. This is due to the reality populated than the other basins'. Details of each <br />that each of the Identified Projects and Processes has Identified Project and Process, as available to SWSI, are <br />risk associated with them and that they may not yield all provided in the tables in the subsections below <br />of the anticipated water supply. Many of these projects associated with each basin. Also provided is a basin-by- <br />and processes will benefit multiple beneficiaries and basin discussion of environmental and recreational flow <br />therefore address a number of objectives concurrently. issues. <br />However, challenges exist in determining funding <br />sources and acquiring water rights to support the multiple <br />uses. The following subsections provide a brief <br />r~ <br />6-10 S:\REPORIIWORD PROCESSING\REPORllS6 11-8-04.DOC <br />