My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Exec Summary Report_11-15-04
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
Exec Summary Report_11-15-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2010 9:24:17 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 9:48:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Statewide
Title
SWSI Phase 1 Report - Executive Summary
Date
11/15/2004
Author
CWCB
SWSI - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Executive Summary <br />Table ES-5 Potential Benefits and Issues of Families of Options for Resolving Supply and Demand Gaps <br /> <br /> <br />Development of Additional Storage <br />Development of New Storage Facilities d Can diversify water sources if water to be ~. There may be significant environmental <br /> stored is from a new source impacts. These impacts are likely to be <br />Construction of new storage facilities. ^ Can increase the reliability of supply and more significant than if enlarging existing <br />Storage options include on channel and off- reduce risk of supply shortfalls storage facilities. <br />channel reservoirs or gravel lakes. ^ Does not impact existing water rights if ^ Loss of recreation associated with free- <br /> storing under a new water right flowing streams, such as fishing, rafting, <br /> . Can potentially reduce the pressure to kayaking. <br /> transfer agricultural rights . Water quality impacts can be associated <br /> ^ Captures an unused resource with impounded water. <br /> ^ Maximizes compact entitlements ^ Cultural impacts associated with inundation <br /> ^ Increases overall system efficiencies by of lands. <br /> minimizing system spills <br />^ Increase the yield of exchanges and non- . Permitting and mitigation can be expensive <br />and lengthy with an uncertain outcome. <br /> potable reuse for irrigation ^ A significant amount of storage may be <br /> ^ Required to firm the yield of agricultural required to produce an acre-foot of firm <br /> transfers yield. The amount of storage required will <br /> ^ May provide flat water recreation be basin and water rights specific. <br /> opportunities <br /> ^ Potential for hydropower generation <br />Enlargement of Existing Storage Facilities ^ Fewer environmental issues than new ^ Environmental and recreation impacts can <br /> storage also occur here depending on the size of <br />Increasing the available storage in existing . Permitting and mitigation requirements may facility. <br />storage facilities. Options include raising be less stringent than new storage . May not diversify water sources <br />dam embankments, dredging and raising ^ Can increase the reliability and reduce risk ^ Permitting and mitigation requirements can <br />spillway levels. of supply shortfalls be expensive and lengthy with an uncertain <br /> ^ Other benefits are the same as outcome <br /> development of new storage ^ May have a high storage to yield ratio, <br /> depending on the water to be stored <br /> ^ Limited number of reservoirs to enlarge, <br /> since most reservoirs are not cost-effective <br /> to enlarge <br /> ^ Limited volume of increased storage <br /> available <br /> ^ May not be cheaper than new storage <br /> since original structures have not been <br /> designed or constructed to current <br /> engineering standards <br />Conjunctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater <br />Non-renewable, Bedrock Aquifers ^ Recharges aquifers that have very low or ~. Surface water supplies must be available <br /> almost non-existent rates of recharge for recharge <br />The diversion and well injection of surface ^ Maximizes the beneficial use of ^ Water has to be treated to potable water <br />water supplies into a bedrock aquifer nonrenewable aquifers and extends their qualiiy and must be chemically compatible <br />during times of surplus surface water and useful life with native groundwater before recharge to <br />extraction of groundwater during times of ^ Evaporation is minimized reduce clogging <br />insufficient surface water supplies. The ^ Lesser environmental impacts than ^ All of the recharged water may not be <br />intent is to extend the life of non-renewable reservoir storage recoverable <br />groundwater sources. ^ The permitting process is simpler than for ^ High energy costs incurred for recharge <br /> developing surface water storage and pumping <br /> ^ Can use existing infrastructure during non- ^ May need additional wells or storage and <br /> peak demand periods surface water treatrnent to meet peak <br /> ^ Potable qualiiy water can be withdrawn demands <br /> . Significant volumes of potential aquifer . Injection rates usually are low <br /> storage available ^ Additional storage needed to capture peak <br /> surface water flows for recharge <br />J~~a <br />$~ole'ri~ice Wo~e' $upplY Initia~ive <br />~~ <br />S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\EXEC SUMMARY 11-10-04.DOC ES-33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.